Open and free deliberation: A prerequisite for positive design

被引:10
作者
Asif, Zaheeruddin [1 ]
Klein, Heinz K. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Fox Sch Business & Management, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[2] SUNY Binghamton, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
[3] Salford Business Sch, Salford, Lancs, England
关键词
Organization design; Positive design; Appreciative Inquiry; Deliberative Inquiry; Habermas Theory of Communicative Action;
D O I
10.1016/j.infoandorg.2009.04.003
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Success in designing organizations and management with a positive lens will require multiple forms of positive inquiry. We introduce the model of Deliberative Inquiry based on Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action as a way to create an additional form of positive inquiry. We argue that Deliberative Inquiry and Appreciative Inquiry naturally complement and support each other in providing a suitable approach to positive design. Whereas the flagship contribution of Appreciative Inquiry is a breakaway from deficit-oriented thinking and a focus on life-generating forces, Deliberative Inquiry's hallmark is the elimination of artificially imposed constraints through rational discourse. Appreciative Inquiry seeks strengths from positive emotions, while Deliberative Inquiry employs positive critique to unmask barriers to change and arrive at morally, ethically and pragmatically sound decisions by mutual and authentic agreement. We conclude by raising some guiding questions for the possibility of providing computer support for such inquiring systems. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 197
页数:12
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], IMAGINED COMMUNI
[2]  
[Anonymous], EUR C EL NETW DEM EN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1962, DO THINGS WORDS
[4]  
Austin JohnL., 1969, SPEECH ACTS ESSAY PH, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
[5]  
Avital M, 2006, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V18, P519
[6]  
Avital M, 2005, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V15, P289
[7]   CREATING APPRECIATIVE LEARNING CULTURES [J].
BARRETT, FJ .
ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, 1995, 24 (02) :36-49
[8]  
Benhabib Seyla., 1996, Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political
[9]  
Berger P. L., 1967, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
[10]  
Bohman James., 2005, CRITICAL THEORY