Bed rest during pregnancy for preventing miscarriage -: art. no. CD003576.pub2

被引:55
作者
Aleman, A [1 ]
Althabe, F [1 ]
Belizán, J [1 ]
Bergel, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Latino Amer Perinatol & Desarrollo Humano, OPS OMS, Montevideo 11000, Uruguay
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2005年 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD003576.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Miscarriage is pregnancy loss before 23 weeks of gestational age and it happens in 10% to 15% of pregnancies depending on maternal age and parity. It is associated with chromosomal defects in about a half or two thirds of cases. Many interventions have been used to prevent miscarriage but bed rest is probably the most commonly prescribed especially in cases of threatened miscarriage and history of previous miscarriage. Since the etiology of miscarriage in most of the cases is not related to an excess of activity, it is unlikely that bed rest could be an effective strategy to reduce spontaneous miscarriage. Objectives To evaluate the effect of prescription of bed rest during pregnancy to prevent miscarriage in women at high risk of miscarriage. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (July 2004). In addition, we searched The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, POPLINE, LILACS and EMBASE. Selection criteria We included all published, unpublished and ongoing randomized trials with reported data which compare clinical outcomes in pregnant women who were prescribed bed rest in hospital or at home for preventing miscarriage compared with alternative care or no intervention. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality of included trials using the methods described in the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook. Studies were included irrespective of their methodological quality. Main results Only two studies including 84 women were identified. There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of miscarriage in the bed rest group versus the no bed rest group (placebo or other treatment) (relative risk (RR) 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92 to 2.58). Neither bed rest in hospital nor bed rest at home showed a significant difference in the prevention of miscarriage. There was a higher risk of miscarriage in those women in the bed rest group than in those in the human chorionic gonadotrophin therapy group with no bed rest (RR 2.50, 95% CI 1.22 to 5.11). It seems that the small number of participants included in these studies is a main factor to make this analysis inconclusive. Authors' conclusions There is insufficient evidence of high quality that supports a policy of bed rest in order to prevent miscarriage in women with confirmed fetal viability and vaginal bleeding in first half of pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Bed rest: a potentially harmful treatment needing more careful evaluation [J].
Allen, C ;
Glasziou, P ;
Del Mar, C .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9186) :1229-1233
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT STAT CLASS DIS R
[3]  
Bamigboye AA, 2003, COCHRANE DATABASE SY, P3
[4]  
Bricker L, 2000, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V4, P1
[5]   The epidemiology of infertility in a rural population [J].
Buckett, W ;
Bentick, B .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 76 (03) :233-237
[6]   Reproductive failure due to spontaneous abortion and recurrent miscarriage [J].
Bulletti, C ;
Flamigni, C ;
Giacomucci, E .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 1996, 2 (02) :118-136
[7]  
Clarke GM, 2000, CONSERV BIOL SER, V4, P1
[8]   Does suppressing luteinising hormone secretion reduce the miscarriage rate? Results of a randomised controlled trial [J].
Clifford, K ;
Rai, R ;
Watson, H ;
Franks, S ;
Regan, L .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7045) :1508-1511
[9]  
CROWTHER C, 1995, EFFECTIVE CARE PREGN, V1, P625
[10]  
Cunningham FG, 1993, WILLIAMS OBSTET