Unsedated transnasal EGD:: an alternative approach to conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for documenting Helicobacter pylori eradication

被引:50
作者
Saeian, K
Townsend, WF
Rochling, FA
Bardan, E
Dua, K
Phadnis, S
Dunn, BE
Darnell, K
Shaker, R
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Pathol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[3] Zablocki VA Med Ctr, Milwaukee, WI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70004-0
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to assess the yield of antral biopsies performed via unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy, a technique that does not require conscious sedation with its concomitant costs and complications, for documentation of Helicobacter pylori eradication. Methods: Nineteen patients who were previously CLO test positive on conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy and subsequently treated for H pylori infection were enrolled. The subjects had not received antibiotic therapy in the prior month and had no prior gastric surgery. By using a GIF-N30 fiberoptic endoscope and a tiny cup biopsy forceps (1.8 mm diameter), unsedated transnasal endoscopy was performed and antral biopsy specimens were taken for a CLO test, histologic analysis (Dieterle stain), and tissue culture. On the same day, the subjects underwent a carbon 13-labeled area urea breath test. All subjects completed a visual analog scale, rating the acceptability of the unsedated transnasal examination and the previous sedated conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the results of the CLO tests (5/19 positive) versus the (13)C-urea breath test (4/19 positive) (p = 0.96), the CLO tests versus histologic findings (5/19 positive) (p = 0.71), or the (13)C-urea breath test versus histologic findings (p = 0.96). All tissue culture results were negative. The overall acceptability of unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy was similar to that of sedated conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Conclusion: Unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy, a technique that eliminates the costs and complications associated with conscious sedation, is a feasible and accurate alternative to conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy when documentation of H pylori eradication and confirmation of gastric ulcer healing are both indicated.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 301
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Clinical economics review: Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease [J].
Bodger, K ;
Daly, MJ ;
Heatley, RV .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1997, 11 (02) :273-282
[2]  
BOURGUIGNON G, 1989, INT CONGR SER, V847, P49
[3]   A comparative study of unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy and conventional EGD [J].
Dean, R ;
Dua, K ;
Massey, B ;
Berger, W ;
Hogan, WJ ;
Shaker, R .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 44 (04) :422-424
[4]  
KLEIN PD, 1993, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V88, P1865
[5]   Advantages and disadvantages of current diagnostic tests for the detection of Helicobacter pylori [J].
Megraud, F .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 31 :57-62
[6]  
Puetz T, 1997, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V92, P254
[7]   UNSEDATED TRANS-NASAL PHARYNGOESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY (T-EGD) - TECHNIQUE [J].
SHAKER, R .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 40 (03) :346-348
[8]  
Thijs JC, 1996, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V91, P2125
[9]  
YAMADA T, 1994, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V272, P65, DOI 10.1001/jama.272.1.65
[10]  
Yousfi MM, 1996, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V43, P222