Mycophenolic acid plasma concentrations in kidney allograft recipients with or without cyclosporin: a cross-sectional study

被引:66
作者
Gregoor, PJHS [1 ]
van Gelder, T [1 ]
Hesse, CJ [1 ]
van der Mast, BJ [1 ]
van Besouw, NM [1 ]
Weimar, W [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rotterdam Hosp, Dept Internal Med 1, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
mycophenolate mofetil; drug monitoring; kidney transplant recipients;
D O I
10.1093/ndt/14.3.706
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. Combining cyclosporin (CsA) and prednisone with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) results in a significant reduction in the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection after kidney transplantation. This is achieved with a standard daily MMF dosage of 2 or 3g. Whether monitoring of the pharmacologically active metabolite mycophenolic acid (MPA) will lead to improved safety and efficacy is unclear. Methods. We monitored MPA trough levels in Is kidney transplant recipients treated with CsA, prednisone, and MMF (63 samples) and in 11 patients (31 samples) treated with prednisone and MMF only, in a cross-sectional study. All patients were at least 3 months after transplantation with stable graft function. All patients were treated with 2 g MMF for at least 3 months and 10 mg prednisone. Results. The MPA trough levels in the CsA-treated patients were significantly lower (P<0.0001; Mann-Whitney) than those in patients on MMF and prednisone only (mean MPA levels 1.98+/-0.12 vs 4.38 +/- 0.40 mg/l respectively). Conclusions. Although all patients were treated with an identical MMF dose, a significant difference was found in the MPA trough levels between CsA- vs non-CsA-treated patients. This suggests that: CsA influences the MPA trough level. The level at which CsA affects the MPA trough levels is unclear.
引用
收藏
页码:706 / 708
页数:3
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Bullingham RES, 1996, TRANSPLANT P, V28, P925
[2]  
CHRISTIANS U, 1991, TRANSPLANT P, V23, P2794
[3]   Mycophenolate mofetil for rescue therapy in acute renal transplant rejection in children should always be monitored by measurement of trough concentration [J].
Filler, G ;
Ehrich, J .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 12 (02) :374-375
[4]   Mycophenolate mofetil - A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy in renal transplantation [J].
Fulton, B ;
Markham, A .
DRUGS, 1996, 51 (02) :278-298
[5]  
GRINYO J, 1995, LANCET, V345, P1321
[6]   Mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients - A pooled efficacy analysis of three randomized, double-blind, clinical studies in prevention of rejection [J].
Halloran, P ;
Mathew, T ;
Tomlanovich, S ;
Groth, C ;
Hooftman, L ;
Barker, C .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 63 (01) :39-47
[7]   Quality assessment issues of new immunosuppressive drugs and experimental experience [J].
Holt, DW ;
Jones, K ;
Lee, T ;
Stadler, P ;
Johnston, A .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1996, 18 (04) :362-367
[8]  
Keown P, 1996, TRANSPLANTATION, V61, P1029
[9]   Pharmacodynamic assessment of mycophenolic acid-induced immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients [J].
Langman, LJ ;
LeGatt, DF ;
Halloran, PF ;
Yatscoff, RW .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1996, 62 (05) :666-672
[10]   Mycophenolate mofetil [J].
Lipsky, JJ .
LANCET, 1996, 348 (9038) :1357-1359