Differences in genome size between closely related species:: The Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup

被引:47
作者
Boulesteix, M
Weiss, M
Biémont, C
机构
[1] Univ Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5558, Lab Biometrie & Biol Evolut, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
[2] Univ Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5534, Ctr Genet Mol & Cellulaire, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
关键词
Drosophila; genome size; phylogeny; transposable elements; satellite DNA;
D O I
10.1093/molbev/msj012
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Genome size varies considerably among organisms due to differences in the amplification, deletion, and divergence of various kinds of repetitive sequences, including the transposable elements, which constitute a large fraction of the genome. However, while the changes in genome size observed at a wide taxonomic level have been thoroughly investigated, we still know little about the process involved in closely related species. We estimated genome sizes and the reverse transcriptase-related sequence (RTRS) content in the nine species of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. We showed that the species differ with regard to their genome size and that the RTRS content is correlated with genome size for all species except Drosophila orena. The genome of D. orena, which is 1.6-fold as big as that of D. melanogaster, has in fact not undergone any major increase in its RTRS content.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 167
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   GENOME AND STRESSES - REACTIONS AGAINST AGGRESSIONS, BEHAVIOR OF TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS [J].
ARNAULT, C ;
DUFOURNEL, I .
GENETICA, 1994, 93 (1-3) :149-160
[2]   DISTRIBUTION OF SATELLITE AND MAIN-BAND DNA COMPONENTS IN MELANOGASTER SPECIES SUBGROUP OF DROSOPHILA .1. FRACTIONATION OF DNA IN ACTINOMYCIN-D AND DISTAMYCIN-A DENSITY GRADIENTS [J].
BARNES, SR ;
WEBB, DA ;
DOVER, G .
CHROMOSOMA, 1978, 67 (04) :341-363
[3]   Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants [J].
Bennetzen, JL ;
Ma, JX ;
Devos, K .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2005, 95 (01) :127-132
[4]  
Bennetzen JL, 1997, PLANT CELL, V9, P1509, DOI 10.1105/tpc.9.9.1509
[5]   Genomic gigantism: DNA loss is slow in mountain grasshoppers [J].
Bensasson, D ;
Petrov, DA ;
Zhang, DX ;
Hartl, DL ;
Hewitt, GM .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2001, 18 (02) :246-253
[6]   POPULATION-DYNAMICS OF THE COPIA, MDG1, MDG3, GYPSY, AND P-TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS IN A NATURAL-POPULATION OF DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER [J].
BIEMONT, C ;
LEMEUNIER, F ;
GUERREIRO, MPG ;
BROOKFIELD, JF ;
GAUTIER, C ;
AULARD, S ;
PASYUKOVA, EG .
GENETICS RESEARCH, 1994, 63 (03) :197-212
[7]   GENOME EVOLUTION IN MOSQUITOS - INTRASPECIFIC AND INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION IN REPETITIVE DNA AMOUNTS AND ORGANIZATION [J].
BLACK, WC ;
RAI, KS .
GENETICS RESEARCH, 1988, 51 (03) :185-196
[8]   EVOLUTION OF THE TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENT UHU IN 5 SPECIES OF HAWAIIAN DROSOPHILA [J].
BREZINSKY, L ;
HUMPHREYS, TD ;
HUNT, JA .
GENETICA, 1992, 86 (1-3) :21-35
[9]   Genome evolution - The changing sizes of genes [J].
Charlesworth, B .
NATURE, 1996, 384 (6607) :315-316
[10]   Distribution of the retrotransposable element 412 in Drosophila species [J].
Cizeron, G ;
Lemeunier, F ;
Loevenbruck, C ;
Brehm, A ;
Biémont, C .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 1998, 15 (12) :1589-1599