Root and root hair mechanisms that confer symbiotic competence for nodulation in acidic soils within Medicago species:: a holistic model

被引:6
作者
Cheng, Y
Waktin, ELJ
Howieson, JG [1 ]
O'Hara, GW
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Ctr Rhizobium Studies, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ Technol, Sch Biomed Sci, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1071/EA03150
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Three experiments were undertaken to investigate the mechanisms used by the annual medic species, Medicago murex (Murex medic) to achieve nodulation more rapidly in acidic soils than the perennial species Medicago sativa ( lucerne). In experiment 1, numbers and locations of root hairs on the primary roots of medic and lucerne were determined from plants grown in soil of pH 4.3 and 7.0. Experiment 2 enumerated the numbers of Sinorhizobium medicae ( rhizobia) associated with the roots of medic and lucerne when grown in an acidic soil. Experiment 3 used a GFP-marked strain of rhizobia to determine the localised distribution of rhizobia along various zones of the primary roots of medic and lucerne in soil of pH 4.3 and 7.0. When grown in an acidic soil, medic produced 60% more root hairs/mm root along the primary root axis compared with lucerne, from 7 days after sowing. In soil of low pH, medic also had higher numbers of rhizobia associated with its entire root system than lucerne, with about 10(3) cfu/cm root throughout the 24-day period of the experiment, compared with lucerne for which rhizobial numbers decreased from 10(2) to 11 cfu/cm root over the same time period. When the intensity of fluorescence emitted by a GFP-marked transconjugant of rhizobia was measured at localised zones along the primary root of medic and lucerne grown in the acidic soil, it was 1.8-fold higher from the roots of medic than lucerne at 7 days after sowing, indicating higher numbers of rhizobia along medic roots. Hence, the numbers of rhizobia associated with the entire root system, and those colonised on localised zones of the primary root of medic were both higher than that of lucerne. These fundamental differences between the 2 species, combined with the earlier finding that lucerne tends to acidify its rhizosphere more than medic, allowed us to construct conceptual models that attempt to explain the increased symbiotic competency of medic compared with lucerne, and the different nodulation responses between medic and lucerne at low pH.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 240
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
BAILEY J, 1999, DICT PLANT SCI
[2]   DIFFERENTIAL RHIZOBIAL COLONIZATION OF THE ROOTS OF SOWN AND VOLUNTEER ANNUAL SPECIES OF MEDICAGO IN AN ACID SOIL [J].
BARCLAY, RM ;
HEBB, DM ;
BROCKWELL, J .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1994, 34 (06) :745-752
[3]   TRANSIENT SUSCEPTIBILITY OF ROOT-CELLS IN 4 COMMON LEGUMES TO NODULATION BY RHIZOBIA [J].
BHUVANESWARI, TV ;
BHAGWAT, AA ;
BAUER, WD .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1981, 68 (05) :1144-1149
[4]  
BROCKWELL J, 1989, AUST J AGR RES, V40, P753, DOI 10.1071/AR9890753
[5]   Succinoglycan is required for initiation and elongation of infection threads during nodulation of alfalfa by Rhizobium meliloti [J].
Cheng, HP ;
Walker, GC .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 1998, 180 (19) :5183-5191
[6]   Proton release by roots of Medicago murex and Medicago sativa growing in acidic conditions, and implications for rhizosphere pH changes and nodulation at low pH [J].
Cheng, Y ;
Howieson, JG ;
O'Hara, GW ;
Watkin, ELJ ;
Souche, G ;
Jaillard, B ;
Hinsinger, P .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2004, 36 (08) :1357-1365
[7]   Medicago sativa and Medicago murex differ in the nodulation response to soil acidity [J].
Cheng, Y ;
Watkin, ELJ ;
O'Hara, GW ;
Howieson, JG .
PLANT AND SOIL, 2002, 238 (01) :31-39
[8]  
FRANCIS CM, 1981, PLANT INTRO REV, V13, P15
[9]   EFFECT OF RHIZOBIA AND SOIL NITRATE ON THE ESTABLISHMENT AND FUNCTIONING OF THE SOYBEAN SYMBIOSIS IN THE FIELD [J].
HERRIDGE, DF ;
ROUGHLEY, RJ ;
BROCKWELL, J .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1984, 35 (02) :149-161
[10]   DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY OF LEGUME NODULATION [J].
HIRSCH, AM .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1992, 122 (02) :211-237