Epidemiology and litigation - the Sellafield childhood leukaemia cases

被引:8
作者
Wakeford, R [1 ]
机构
[1] British Nucl Fuels Plc, Warrington WA3 6AS, Cheshire, England
关键词
association and causation; expert evidence; ionizing radiation; legal judgments; legal process; science and law;
D O I
10.1111/1467-985X.00111
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Statisticians and scientists are often required to provide information outside the scientific community. One important example is as an expert witness in the law courts. The civil litigation cases of Reay versus British Nuclear Fuels pie and Hope versus British Nuclear Fuels pie are a vivid illustration of how science and scientists interact with the law and lawyers. The personal injury cases were decided on the basis of how a specific epidemiological association should be properly interpreted, and this involved many experts. It is desirable that statisticians and scientists understand the nature of expert evidence, and these two cases are used to illuminate the role of the scientist in civil litigation.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 325
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   LEUKEMIA AND NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS [J].
BERAL, V .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 300 (6722) :411-412
[3]  
BOWDEN P, 1995, RADIOL PROTN B, V167, P21
[4]  
BOWDEN P, 1994, INT INSUR LAW REV, V2, P116
[5]  
BOWDEN P, 1996, J RADIOL PROT, V16, P107
[6]  
*COMM MED ASP RAD, 1996, 4 REP INC CANC LEUK
[7]  
*COMM MED ASP RAD, 1989, 3 REP REP INC CHILDH
[8]  
*COMM MED ASP RAD, 1988, 2 REP INV POSS INCR
[9]  
*COMM MED ASP RAD, 1990, HANSARD, V170
[10]  
*COMM MED ASP RAD, 1986, 1 REP IMPL NEW DAT R