Competitiveness of Brazilian sugarcane ethanol compared to US corn ethanol

被引:90
作者
Crago, Christine L. [2 ]
Khanna, Madhu [1 ]
Barton, Jason [3 ]
Giuliani, Eduardo [4 ]
Amaral, Weber [5 ]
机构
[1] Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Urbana, IL USA
[2] Energy Biosci Inst, Urbana, IL USA
[3] Univ British Columbia, Fac Land & Food Syst, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[4] Venture Partners Brasil, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Univ Sao Paulo, ESALQ, Dept Forest Sci, BR-13148900 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
关键词
Economic competitiveness; Renewable fuel standard; Ethanol trade policy; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LAND-USE; REDUCTIONS; MARKET; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
020101 [政治经济学];
摘要
Corn ethanol produced in the US and sugarcane ethanol produced in Brazil are the world's leading sources of biofuel. Current US biofuel policies create both incentives and constraints for the import of ethanol from Brazil and together with the cost competitiveness and greenhouse gas intensity of sugarcane ethanol compared to corn ethanol will determine the extent of these imports. This study analyzes the supply-side determinants of cost competitiveness and compares the greenhouse gas intensity of corn ethanol and sugarcane ethanol delivered to US ports. We find that while the cost of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil is lower than that of corn ethanol in the US, the inclusion of transportation costs for the former and co-product credits for the latter changes their relative competitiveness. We also find that the relative cost of ethanol in the US and Brazil is highly sensitive to the prevailing exchange rate and prices of feedstocks. At an exchange rate of US$1=R$2.15 the cost of corn ethanol is 15% lower than the delivered cost of sugarcane ethanol at a US port. Sugarcane ethanol has lower GHG emissions than corn ethanol but a price of over $113 per ton of CO2 is needed to affect competitiveness. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7404 / 7415
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]
*AGR, 2010, ESP TECN DIF IMP ET
[2]
ANL, 2008, GREENH GAS REG EM EN
[3]
Explaining the experience curve: Cost reductions of Brazilian ethanol from sugarcane [J].
Bake, J. D. van den Wall ;
Junginger, M. ;
Faaij, A. ;
Poot, T. ;
Walter, A. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2009, 33 (04) :644-658
[4]
CARB (California Air Resources Board), 2009, DET CAL MOD GREET PA
[5]
CARVALHO J, 2010, BUSINESS NEWS AM
[6]
CONAB, 2008, Working paper
[7]
DALE RT, 2006, 0604 PURD U DEP AGR
[8]
EIDMAN VR, 2007, ETHANOL EC DRY MILLS
[9]
Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt [J].
Fargione, Joseph ;
Hill, Jason ;
Tilman, David ;
Polasky, Stephen ;
Hawthorne, Peter .
SCIENCE, 2008, 319 (5867) :1235-1238
[10]
*FARMDOC, 2007, ETH DRY MILL PLANT S