Simulating endosulfan transport in runoff from cotton fields in Australia with the GLEAMS model

被引:21
作者
Connolly, RD
Kennedy, IR
Silburn, DM
Simpson, BW
Freebairn, DM
机构
[1] Queensland Dep Nat Resources, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Dept Agr Chem & Soil Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Queensland Dep Nat Resources, Resource Sci Ctr, Indooroopilly, Qld 4068, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2001.303702x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Endosulfan (6,7,8,9,10,10 hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a -hexahydro-6,9- methano 2,4,3 benzodioxathiepin 3-oxide), a pesticide that is highly toxic to aquatic organisms, is widely used in the cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) industry in Australia and is a risk to the downstream riverine environment. We used the GLEAMS model to evaluate the effectiveness of a range of management scenarios aimed at minimizing endosulfan transport in runoff at the field stale. The field management scenarios simulated were (i) Conventional, bare soil at the beginning of the cotton season and seven irrigations per season; (ii) Improved Irrigation, irrigation amounts reduced and frequency increased to reduce runoff from excess irrigation; (iii) Dryland, no irrigation; (iv) Stubble Retained, increased soil cover created by retaining residue from the previous crop or a specially planted winter cover crop; and (v) Reduced Sprays, a fewer number of sprays. Stubble Retained was the most effective scenario for minimizing endosulfan transport because infiltration was increased and erosion reduced, and the stubble intercepted and neutralized a proportion of the applied endosulfan. Reducing excess irrigation reduced annual export rates by 80 to 90%, but transport in larger storm events was still high. Reducing the number of pesticide applications only reduced transport when three or fewer sprays were applied. We conclude that endosulfan transport from cotton farms ran be minimized with a combination of field management practices that reduce excess irrigation and concentration of pesticide on the soil at any point in time; however, discharges, probably with endosulfan concentrations exceeding guideline values, will still occur in storm events.
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 713
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   A simulation study of erosion in the Emerald Irrigation Area [J].
Connolly, RD ;
Carroll, C ;
Francis, J ;
Silburn, DM ;
Simpson, B ;
Freebairn, DM .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1999, 37 (03) :479-494
[2]  
COOPER B, 1996, 96048 DEP LAND WAT C
[3]  
FOSTER GR, 1985, T ASAE, V28, P133
[4]  
FOSTER GR, 1981, T ASAE, V24, P1253, DOI 10.13031/2013.34429
[5]  
Hedden K. F., 1986, VADOSE ZONE MODELING, P81
[6]  
Isbell R. F., 1996, AUSTR SOIL CLASSIFIC, V4
[7]   Off-site movement of endosulfan from irrigated cotton in New South Wales [J].
Kennedy, IR ;
Sánchez-Bayo, F ;
Kimber, SW ;
Hugo, L ;
Ahmad, N .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2001, 30 (03) :683-696
[8]   Representing management practices in GLEAM [J].
Knisel, WG ;
Leonard, RA ;
Davis, FM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1995, 4 (04) :499-505
[9]  
KNISEL WG, 1992, GLEAMS VERSION 2 0 3
[10]  
Knisel WG., 1980, 26 USDA