Screening families for intracranial aneurysms: Anxiety, perceived risk, and informed choice

被引:11
作者
Bossuyt, PMM
Raaymakers, TWM
Bonsel, GJ
Rinkel, GJE
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
screening; informed choice;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.07.002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Family screening programs for intracranial aneurysms have been considered but there are concerns about raised anxiety and depression, inadequate risk perception, and the principle of informed choice. Methods. Observational study in 980 first-degree relatives of 172 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. After being informed, consenting subjects completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), answered standardized questions on perceived risk, and responded to a list of statements about the decision-making process. Main results. 166 subjects (21%) declined the screening offer. 12% of the participants reported HADS anxiety scores in the moderate to severe range; 2% did so for feelings of depression. All relatives substantially underestimated the risk of harboring an aneurysm and of aneurysm rupture. 98% of the participants (96% of non-participants, P = 0.60) reported feeling free to make a choice, while 31% of the participants (42% of non-participants, P = 0.16) felt more or less compelled to participate in the screening program. Conclusions. The invitation to a family screening program for intracranial aneurysms does not lead to increased feelings of anxiety or depression. The unrealistic risk perception stresses the need of clear and detailed information. Attention should be given to factors that may interfere with the principle of informed choice. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 799
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Use of decision aids to support informed choices about screening [J].
Barratt, A ;
Trevena, L ;
Davey, HM ;
McCaffery, K .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7464) :507-510
[2]   The adequacy of measurement of short and long-term consequences of false-positive screening mammography [J].
Brodersen, J ;
Thorsen, H ;
Cockburn, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2004, 11 (01) :39-44
[3]   Screening for breast cancer is associated with a low degree of psychological distress [J].
Ekeberg, O ;
Skjauff, H ;
Kåresen, R .
BREAST, 2001, 10 (01) :20-24
[4]   Short-term effects of population-based screening for prostate cancer on health-related quality of life [J].
Essink-Bot, ML ;
de Koning, HJ ;
Nijs, HGT ;
Kirkels, WJ ;
van der Maas, PJ ;
Schröder, FH .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (12) :925-931
[5]   Medicine - Communicating statistical information [J].
Hoffrage, U ;
Lindsey, S ;
Hertwig, R ;
Gigerenzer, G .
SCIENCE, 2000, 290 (5500) :2261-2262
[6]  
Khaira HS, 1998, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V80, P341
[7]  
Marshall KG, 1996, CAN MED ASSOC J, V155, P377
[8]   Screening for cardiovascular risk: public health imperative or matter for individual informed choice? [J].
Marteau, TM ;
Kinmonth, AL .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7355) :78-80
[9]  
Raaymakers TWM, 1999, NEW ENGL J MED, V341, P1344
[10]   A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects [J].
Spinhoven, P ;
Ormel, J ;
Sloekers, PPA ;
Kempen, GIJM ;
Speckens, AEM ;
VanHemert, AM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1997, 27 (02) :363-370