A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment

被引:386
作者
Ramanathan, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Indira Gandhi Inst Dev Res Santosh Nagar, Mumbai, India
关键词
environmental impact assessment; analytic hierarchy process; socio-economic impact assessment;
D O I
10.1006/jema.2001.0455
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is an intrinsically complex multi-dimensional process, involving multiple criteria and multiple actors. Multi-criteria methods can serve as useful decision aids for carrying out the EIA. This paper proposes the use of a multi-criteria technique, namely the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), for the purpose. AHP has the flexibility to combine quantitative and qualitative factors, to handle different groups of actors, to combine the opinions expressed by many experts, and can help in stakeholder analysis. The main shortcomings of AHP and some modifications to it to overcome the shortcomings are briefly described. Finally, the use of AHP is illustrated for a case study involving socioeconomic impact assessment. In this case study, AHP has been used for capturing the perceptions of stakeholders on the relative severity of different socio-economic impacts, which will help the authorities in prioritizing their environmental management plan, and can also help in allocating the budget available for mitigating adverse socio-economic impacts. (9) 2001 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 35
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
ADGER WN, 1998, 5 BIENN M INT SOC EC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, APPLYING STRATEGIC E
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preference and Value Tradeoffs
[4]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.1080/14615517.1998.10590184
[5]   ON A SHORT-COMING OF SAATY METHOD OF ANALYTIC HIERARCHIES [J].
BELTON, V ;
GEAR, T .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1983, 11 (03) :228-230
[6]   A new approach to evaluate generation capacity bids [J].
Chattopadhyay, D ;
Ramanathan, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1998, 13 (04) :1232-1237
[7]   A NOTE ON THE ANALYSIS OF SUBJECTIVE JUDGMENT MATRICES [J].
CRAWFORD, G ;
WILLIAMS, C .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 29 (04) :387-405
[8]   REMARKS ON THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
DYER, JS .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1990, 36 (03) :249-258
[9]   INCREASING THE UTILIZATION OF SOLAR-ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES (SET) IN JORDAN - ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
ELKARMI, F ;
MUSTAFA, I .
ENERGY POLICY, 1993, 21 (09) :978-982
[10]   Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: A review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities [J].
Grimble, R ;
Wellard, K .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1997, 55 (02) :173-193