PERCEPTIONS OF SCIENCE AND AMERICAN SECULARISM

被引:29
作者
Baker, Joseph O. [1 ]
机构
[1] E Tennessee State Univ, Johnson City, TN 37614 USA
关键词
atheism; science and religion; secularization; public science; nones; RELIGIOUS NONES; FUZZY FIDELITY; ATHEISM; CHRISTIANITY; SCIENTISTS; IDENTITY; BRITAIN; DECLINE; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1525/sop.2012.55.1.167
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Theorized links between science and secularism are prevalent in classic sociological thought. More recently, scholars have critiqued these frameworks as oversimplified and empirically untenable. In response to such criticisms, contemporary researchers typically overlook or actively argue against links between science and secularism. This study analyzes data from a random, national survey of adults to examine the empirical connections between perceptions of science and secular identities in the United States. Analyses demonstrate that perceptions of science correlate strongly with American secularism, particularly among atheists and agnostics. Additionally, politicized views of science help account for the previously documented relationship between political and secular identities in the United States. A perspective drawing on the sociology of culture and perceived knowledge provides a more useful framework for understanding these patterns than theories of secularization.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 188
页数:22
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
Almond GabrielA., 2003, STRONG RELIG RISE FU
[2]  
Anderson Elizabeth, 2007, GOD IS DEAD IS EVERY
[3]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U CINCINNATI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, DO YOU KNOW EC ORDIN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Sociology and Scientism: The American Quest for Objectivity, 1880-1940
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Chaos of disciplines
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, FAITH FLUX CHANG REL
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2007, SAGE HDB SOCIOLOGY R
[9]  
Arouet Francois-Marie, 1972, PHILOS DICT
[10]   American Piety 2005: Content and methods of the Baylor Religion Survey [J].
Bader, Christopher D. ;
Mencken, F. Carson ;
Froese, Paul .
JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION, 2007, 46 (04) :447-463