A comparison of bilateral versus unilateral target and distractor presentation in the remote distractor paradigm

被引:15
作者
Benson, Valerie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Sch Psychol, Ctr Visual Cognit, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
关键词
remote distractor effect (RDE); discrimination and decision processes;
D O I
10.1027/1618-3169.55.5.334
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The remote distractor effect (RDE) is a robust finding of an increase in saccade onset latencies (20-40ms) when a distractor is presented simultaneously with a target, compared to when a target is presented on its own (Walker, Deubel, Schneider, & Findlay, 1997). Distractors presented at fixation produce the largest RDE and the effect decreases as distractors are moved into the periphery. Data from two experiments that contrast with these standard findings are reported. Under bilateral target presentation, larger RDE magnitudes occurred for peripheral than for central distractors, whereas under unilateral presentation, the pattern reversed. The findings are discussed with reference to discrimination processes, attentional factors and current models of oculomotor control. It is suggested that in bilateral target presentation the competition between the distractor and the target results in the programming of a saccade to the distractor, as well as a saccade to the target. Time taken to cancel the saccade to the distractor produces the increased saccade latency for peripheral distractors in that condition.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 341
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Comparison of the discharge characteristics of brain stem omnipause neurons and superior colliculus fixation neurons in monkey:: Implications for control of fixation and saccade behavior [J].
Everling, S ;
Paré, M ;
Dorris, MC ;
Munoz, DP .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 79 (02) :511-528
[2]   GLOBAL VISUAL PROCESSING FOR SACCADIC EYE-MOVEMENTS [J].
FINDLAY, JM .
VISION RESEARCH, 1982, 22 (08) :1033-1045
[3]   A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition [J].
Findlay, JM ;
Walker, R .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1999, 22 (04) :661-+
[4]   Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: Evidence for a competitive integration model [J].
Godijn, R ;
Theeuwes, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2002, 28 (05) :1039-1054
[5]   Role of frontal eye fields in countermanding saccades: Visual, movement, and fixation activity [J].
Hanes, DP ;
Patterson, WF ;
Schall, JD .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 79 (02) :817-834
[6]   The remote distractor effect of saccade latencies in fixation-offset and overlap conditions [J].
Honda, H .
VISION RESEARCH, 2005, 45 (21) :2773-2779
[7]  
Levy-Schoen A, 1969, ANEE PSYCHOL, V74, P43
[8]   OCULOMOTOR PROGRAMMING AND PERCEPTION [J].
LEVYSCHO.A ;
BLANCGAR.J .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1974, 71 (2-3) :443-450
[9]   The remote distractor effect in saccade programming: channel interactions and lateral inhibition [J].
Ludwig, CJH ;
Gilchrist, ID ;
McSorley, E .
VISION RESEARCH, 2005, 45 (09) :1177-1190
[10]   Lateral inhibitory interactions in the intermediate layers of the monkey superior colliculus [J].
Munoz, DP ;
Istvan, PJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 79 (03) :1193-1209