A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density

被引:42
作者
Glide-Hurst, Carri K.
Duric, Neb
Littrup, Peter
机构
[1] Karmanos Canc Inst, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Hudson Webber Canc Res Ctr, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
关键词
mammographic breast density; segmentation; BI-RADS;
D O I
10.1118/1.2789407
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Women with mammographic percent density > 50% have a similar to three-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer, potentially making them screening candidates for breast MRI scanning. The purpose of this work is to introduce a new method to quantify mammographic percent density (MPD), and to compare the results with the current standard of care for breast density assessment. Craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) mammograms for 104 patients were digitized and analyzed using an interactive computer- assisted segmentation routine implemented for two purposes: (1) to segment the breast area from background and radiographic markers, and (2) to segment dense from fatty portions of the breast. Our technique was evaluated by comparing the results to qualitative estimates determined by a certified breast radiologist using the BI-RADS Categorical Assessment (1 (fatty) to 4 (dense) scale). Statistically significant correlations (two-tailed, p < 0.01) were observed between calculated MPD and BI-RADS for both CC (Spearman p=0.67) and MLO views (Spearman p=0.71). For the CC view, statistically significant differences were revealed between the mean MPD for each BI-RADS category except between fatty (BI-RADS 1) and scattered (BI-RADS 2). Finally, for the MLO views, statistically significant differences in the mean MPD between all BI-RADS categories were observed. Comparing the CC and MLO views revealed a strong positive correlation (Pearson r=0.8) in calculated MPD. In addition, an evaluation of the reproducibility of our segmentation demonstrated the average standard deviation of MPD for a subsample of eight patients, measured five times, was 1.9% (range: 0.03%-9.9%). Eliminating one misassignment reduced the average standard deviation to 0.75% (range: 0.03%-3.16%). Further ana lysis of similar to 10% of the patient sample revealed strong agreement (ICC=0.80-0.85) in the reliability of MPD estimates for both mammographic views. Overall, these results demonstrate the feasibility of utilizing our approach for quantitative breast density segmentation, which may be useful for detecting small changes in MPD introduced through chemoprevention, diet, or other interventions. (c) 2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:4491 / 4498
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
American College of Radiology, 2003, BI RADS BREAST IM RE
[2]   Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography [J].
Barlow, William E. ;
White, Emily ;
Ballard-Barbash, Rachel ;
Vacek, Pamela M. ;
Titus-Ernstoff, Linda ;
Carney, Patricia A. ;
Tice, Jeffrey A. ;
Buist, Diana S. M. ;
Geller, Berta M. ;
Rosenberg, Robert ;
Yankaskas, Bonnie C. ;
Kerlikowske, Karla .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (17) :1204-1214
[3]   Breast imaging reporting and data system: Inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment [J].
Berg, WA ;
Campassi, C ;
Langenberg, P ;
Sexton, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (06) :1769-1777
[4]  
Boyd NF, 1998, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V7, P1133
[5]   QUANTITATIVE CLASSIFICATION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITIES AND BREAST-CANCER RISK - RESULTS FROM THE CANADIAN NATIONAL BREAST SCREENING STUDY [J].
BOYD, NF ;
BYNG, JW ;
JONG, RA ;
FISHELL, EK ;
LITTLE, LE ;
MILLER, AB ;
LOCKWOOD, GA ;
TRITCHLER, DL ;
YAFFE, MJ .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (09) :670-675
[6]   Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Guo, Helen ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Sun, Limei ;
Stone, Jennifer ;
Fishell, Eve ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Hislop, Greg ;
Chiarelli, Anna ;
Minkin, Salomon ;
Yaffe, Martin J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03) :227-236
[7]  
Brisson J, 2003, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V12, P728
[8]   THE QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITIES [J].
BYNG, JW ;
BOYD, NF ;
FISHELL, E ;
JONG, RA ;
YAFFE, MJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (10) :1629-1638
[9]   Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images [J].
Byng, JW ;
Boyd, NF ;
Little, L ;
Lockwood, G ;
Fishell, E ;
Jong, RA ;
Yaffe, MJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 1996, 5 (05) :319-327
[10]   Automated analysis of mammographic densities [J].
Byng, JW ;
Boyd, NF ;
Fishell, E ;
Jong, RA ;
Yaffe, MJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1996, 41 (05) :909-923