State policy affecting pain management: recent improvements and the positive impact of regulatory health policies

被引:22
作者
Gilson, AM [1 ]
Maurer, MA [1 ]
Joranson, DE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Pain & Policy Studies Grp, Madison, WI 53711 USA
关键词
state healthcare policy; medical decision-making; opioid prescribing; policy evaluation; pain management;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.01.004
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Criteria-driven policy analysis resources from the University of Wisconsin Pain and Policy Studies Group (PPSG) evaluated drug control and professional practice policies that can influence use of controlled substances for pain management, and documented changes over a 3-year period. Additional research was needed to determine the extent of change, the types of messages contained in the policies, and what has contributed to changing policy content. Four research aims guided this study: (1) evaluate change between 2000 and 2003 of state policy that can affect pain relief, (2) describe content differences for statutes, regulations, guidelines, and policy statements, (3) evaluate differences between policies specific to pain management and policies governing general healthcare practice, and (4) compare content of policies specific to pain management created by healthcare regulatory boards to those created by state legislatures. Results showed that more current policies, especially policies regulating health professionals, tend to encourage pain management and avoid language that restricts professional decision-making and patient treatment. In addition, pain policies from healthcare regulatory boards were generally less restrictive than statutes or policies that govern general healthcare practice. These findings suggest that the positive policy change results primarily from state medical, pharmacy, and nursing boards adopting policies promoting pain management and the use of opioids, while containing few if any restrictions. Despite this improvement, further progress can be made when states continue to abrogate additional restrictions or clinically obsolete provisions from policies. PPSG policy evaluations provide guidance to lawmakers, healthcare regulators, and clinicians who are striving to achieve balanced policy, an attainable but redoubtable goal, to benefit patient care. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 204
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
*AM AC PAIN MED AM, 2004, PUBL POL STAT RIGHTS
[2]  
American Academy of Pain Medicine and American Pain Society, 1997, US OP TREATM CHRON P
[3]  
American Pain Society, 2003, PRINC AN US TREATM A
[4]  
[Anonymous], POS FED STAT MED BOA
[5]  
[Anonymous], MOD GUID US CONTR SU
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1972, FED REG, V37
[7]  
[Anonymous], J PHARM CARE PAIN S
[8]  
*CANC PAIN MAN POL, 2001, AM CANC SOC POS STAT
[9]   Working with regulators to improve the standard of care in pain management: The US experience [J].
Dahl, JL .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2002, 24 (02) :136-146
[10]  
Dilcher Amy J, 2004, Ann Health Law, V13, P81