Slavoj Zizek's dialectics of ideology and the discourses of Irish education

被引:5
作者
Seery, Aidan [1 ]
机构
[1] Trinity Coll Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
educational discourses; Zizek; educational ideology; subjectivity;
D O I
10.1080/03323310802021847
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
A number of different languages or discourses are evident in contemporary Irish educational policy, debate and theory: the grammar of commodity and marketisation, the poetry of Bildung and culture, the prose of Christian formation and revelation together with the ubiquitous rhetoric of personal developmental psychology. These are among the languages and dialects vying for descriptive, and more significantly, normative dominance. All of these languages claim both to describe and legitimise the reality of education while tensions and antagonism between these understandings divide the educational community, politicians and social commentators. They also function as 'formative discourses' shaping the way in which we view and imagine learners. Reading these languages as examples of dialectical ideology types as proposed by Slavoj Zizek together with the application of his critique of ideology suggest a new way of illuminating the languages of education. In the course of this critique a novel notion of the subjectivity of the learner that eludes dominance by language and the symbolic order is proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 146
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Althusser Louis., 1971, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, P85
[2]  
Althusser Louis., 1994, MAPPING IDEOLOGY, P100
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1974, GERMAN IDEOLOGY 1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Epistemology
[5]   How general can Bildung be?: Reflections on the future of a modern educational ideal [J].
Biesta, G .
JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION, 2002, 36 (03) :377-390
[6]  
BURBULES NC, 1992, INT J QUAL STUD EDUC, V5, P7
[7]  
Douglass S., 2004, Current Issues in Comparative Education, V7, P5
[8]  
Eagleton Terry, 2003, Figures of Dissent
[9]  
Foucault Michel., 1995, DISCIPLINE PUNISH, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.1086/448181
[10]  
Habermas J., 1967, LOGIC SOCIAL SCI