The impact of reference pricing of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents on the use and costs of analgesic drugs

被引:24
作者
Grootendorst, PV
Marshall, JK
Holbrook, AM
Dolovich, LR
O'Brien, BJ
Levy, AR
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Fac Pharm, Toronto, ON M5S 2S2, Canada
[2] St Joseph Hosp, Ctr Evaluat Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Fac Pharm, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Family Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Dept Hlth Care & Epidemiol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
关键词
reference pricing; generic substitution; prescription drugs; drug cost containment; NSAIDs;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00420.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To estimate the effect of reference pricing (RP) of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on drug subsidy program and beneficiary expenditures on analgesic drugs. Data Sources/Study Setting. Monthly claims data from Pharmacare, the public drug subsidy program for seniors in British Columbia, Canada, over the period of February 1993 to June 2001. Study Design. RP limits drug plan reimbursement of interchangeable medicines to a reference price, which is typically equal to the price of the lowest cost interchangeable drug; any cost above that is borne by the patient. Pharmacare introduced two different forms of RP to the NSAIDs, Type 1 in April 1994 and Type 2 in November 1995. Under Type 1 RP, generic and brand versions of the same NSAID are considered interchangeable, whereas under Type 2 RP different NSAIDs are considered interchangeable. We extrapolated average reimbursement per day of NSAID therapy over the months before RP to estimate what expenditures would have been without the policies. These counterfactual predictions were compared with actual values to estimate the impact of the policies; the estimated impacts on reimbursement rates were multiplied by the postpolicy volume of NSAIDS dispensed, which appeared unaffected by the policies, to estimate expenditure changes. Principal Findings. After Type 2 RP, program expenditures declined by $22.7 million (CAN), or $4 million (CAN), annually cutting expenditure by about half. Most savings accrued from the substitution of low-cost NSAIDs for more costly alternatives. About 20 percent of savings represented expenditures by seniors who elected to pay for partially reimbursed drugs. Type 1 RP produced one-quarter the savings of type 2 RP. Conclusions. Type 2 RP of NSAIDs achieved its goal of reducing drug expenditures and was more effective than Type 1 RP. The effects of RP on patient health and associated health care costs remain to be investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:1297 / 1317
页数:21
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Altman RD, 2000, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V43, P1905
[2]   Price regulation of pharmaceuticals in Canada [J].
Anis, AH ;
Wen, Q .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1998, 17 (01) :21-38
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, ICES PRACTICE ATLAS, P339
[4]  
*BRIT COL MIN HLTH, 2001, PHARM TRENDS 2000
[5]  
BROOKS PM, 1991, NEW ENGL J MED, V324, P1716
[6]  
Garcia Rodriguez LA, 1998, AM J MED, V104, p41S
[7]  
Health Canada, 2003, ARTHR CAN ONG CHALL
[8]   Variability in risk of gastrointestinal complications with individual non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Results of a collaborative meta-analysis [J].
Henry, D ;
Lim, LLY ;
Rodriguez, LAG ;
Gutthann, SP ;
Carson, JL ;
Griffin, M ;
Savage, R ;
Logan, R ;
Moride, Y ;
Hawkey, C ;
Hill, S ;
Fries, JT .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7046) :1563-1566
[9]  
HOLBROOK AM, 2001, MED TREATMENT GUIDEL
[10]   The Medicare prescription drug benefit: How will the game be played? [J].
Huskamp, HA ;
Rosenthal, MB ;
Frank, RG ;
Newhouse, JP .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2000, 19 (02) :8-23