A choice modelling analysis on the similarity between distribution utilities' and industrial customers' price and quality preferences

被引:6
作者
Soderberg, Magnus [1 ]
机构
[1] Gothenburg Sch Business Econ & Law, Dept Business Adm Ind & Financial Management, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
regulation; electricity distribution; choice modelling; random parameter logit;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2007.01.013
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Swedish Electricity Act states that electricity distribution must comply with both price and quality requirements. In order to maintain efficient regulation it is necessary to firstly, define quality attributes and secondly, determine a customer's priorities concerning price and quality attributes. If distribution utilities gain an understanding of customer preferences and incentives for reporting them, the regulator can save a lot of time by surveying them rather than their customers. This study applies a choice modelling methodology where utilities and industrial customers are asked to evaluate the same twelve choice situations in which price and four specific quality attributes are varied. The preferences expressed by the utilities, and estimated by a random parameter logit, correspond quite well with the preferences expressed by the largest industrial customers. The preferences expressed by the utilities are reasonably homogenous in relation to forms of association (private limited, public and trading partnership). If the regulator acts according to the preferences expressed by the utilities, smaller industrial customers will have to pay for quality they have not asked for. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1246 / 1262
页数:17
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain [J].
Alvarez-Farizo, B ;
Hanley, N .
ENERGY POLICY, 2002, 30 (02) :107-116
[2]   THE SOCIAL COST OF UNSUPPLIED ELECTRICITY - A CRITICAL-REVIEW [J].
ANDERSSON, R ;
TAYLOR, L .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1986, 8 (03) :139-146
[3]   Price-quality tradeoffs and welfare effects in cable television markets [J].
Beard, TR ;
Ekelund, RB ;
Ford, GS ;
Saba, RS .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2001, 20 (02) :107-123
[4]   Response bias in a conjoint analysis of power outages [J].
Beenstock, M ;
Goldin, E ;
Haitovsky, Y .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1998, 20 (02) :135-156
[5]  
Brownstone D, 1999, J ECONOMETRICS, V89, P109
[6]   Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles [J].
Brownstone, D ;
Bunch, DS ;
Train, K .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2000, 34 (05) :315-338
[7]  
Buchanan J.M., 1965, The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy, V100
[8]  
CARLSSON F, 2005, DOES IT MATTER POWER
[9]  
CARLSSON F, 2005, WILLINGNESS PAY SWED
[10]  
Greene H.W., 2008, ECONOMETRIC ANAL, V6th