Improving colorectal cancer screening among the medically underserved: A pilot study within a federally qualified health center

被引:86
作者
Khankari, Kishore
Eder, Mickey
Osborn, Chandra Y.
Makoul, Gregory
Clayman, Marla
Skripkauskas, Silvia
Diamond-Shapiro, Linda
Makundan, Dan
Wolf, Michael S.
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Hlth Literacy & Learning Program, Inst Healthcare Studies, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Access Community Hlth Network, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
physician-patient communication; colorectal cancer; screening; intervention; FQHC; health literacy; underserved;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-007-0295-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer screening rates remain low, especially among low-income and racial/ethnic minority groups. OBJECTIVE: We pilot-tested a physician-directed strategy aimed at improving rates of recommendation and patient colorectal cancer screening completion at 1 federally qualified health center serving low-income, African-American and Hispanic patients. Colonoscopy was specifically targeted. DESIGN: Single arm, pretest-posttest design. SETTINGS: Urban. PATIENTS: 154 screening-eligible, yet nonadherent primary care patients receiving care at an urban, federally qualified health center. INTERVENTION: 1) manually tracking screening-eligible patients, 2) mailing patients a physician letter and brochure before medical visits, 3) health literacy training to help physicians improve their communication with patients to work to resolution, and 4) establishing a "feedback loop" to routinely monitor patient compliance. MEASUREMENT: Chart review of whether patients received a physician recommendation for screening, and completion of any colorectal cancer screening test 12 months after intervention. Physicians recorded patients' qualitative reasons for noncompliance, and a preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis for screening promotion was also conducted. RESULTS: The baseline screening rate was 11.5%, with 31.6% of patients having received a recommendation from their physician. At 1-year follow-up, rates of screening completion had increased to 27.9 percent (p <.001), and physician recommendation had increased to 92.9% (p <.001). Common reasons for nonadherence included patient readiness (60.7%), competing health problems (11.9%), and fear or anxiety concerning the procedure (8.3%). The total cost for implementing the intervention was $4,676 and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the intervention was $106 per additional patient screened by colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention appears to be a feasible means to improve colorectal cancer screening rates among patients served by community health centers. However, more attention to patient decision making and education may be needed to further increase screening rates.
引用
收藏
页码:1410 / 1414
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Examining the cost-effectiveness of cancer screening promotion [J].
Andersen, MR ;
Urban, N ;
Ramsey, S ;
Briss, PA .
CANCER, 2004, 101 (05) :1229-1238
[2]   American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: Update 1997 [J].
Byers, T ;
Levin, B ;
Rothenberger, D ;
Dodd, GD ;
Smith, RA .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1997, 47 (03) :154-&
[3]  
*CDCP, SCREEN LIF NATL COL
[4]   Health literacy and cancer communication [J].
Davis, TC ;
Williams, MV ;
Marin, E ;
Parker, RM ;
Glass, J .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2002, 52 (03) :134-149
[5]   Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy [J].
Denberg, TD ;
Melhado, TV ;
Coombes, JM ;
Beaty, BL ;
Berman, K ;
Byers, TE ;
Marcus, AC ;
Steiner, JF ;
Ahnen, DJ .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 (11) :989-995
[6]  
FERREIRA MR, 2005, J CLIN ONCOL, V23, P1001
[7]  
*I MED, 2004, HLTH LIT PRESC END C
[8]   Socioeconomic status and stage at presentation of colorectal cancer [J].
Ionescu, MV ;
Carey, F ;
Tait, IS ;
Steele, RJC .
LANCET, 1998, 352 (9138) :1439-1439
[9]  
KOLATA G, 2005, UNEXPECTED MED BENEF, pA14
[10]  
Lantz P M, 1996, J Public Health Manag Pract, V2, P54