COMPARISON OF TWO HEURISTIC APPROACHES FOR SOLVING THE PRODUCTION SCHEDULING PROBLEM

被引:8
作者
Andziulis, Arunas [1 ]
Dzemydiene, Dale [2 ]
Steponavicius, Raimundas [3 ]
Jakovlev, Sergej [1 ]
机构
[1] Klaipeda Univ, LT-91225 Klaipeda, Lithuania
[2] Mykolas Romeris Univ, LT-08303 Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] Newcastle Univ, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
来源
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND CONTROL | 2011年 / 40卷 / 02期
关键词
theory of algorithms; production scheduling; asymmetric travelling salesman problem; Ant Colony optimization; nearest neighbor; TRAVELING SALESMAN PROBLEM; OPTIMIZATION APPROACH; GENETIC ALGORITHM; TSP; MODEL;
D O I
10.5755/j01.itc.40.2.426
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
080201 [机械制造及其自动化];
摘要
Production scheduling problems attract a lot of attention among applied scientists and practitioners working in the field of combinatorial optimization and optimization software development since they are encountered in many different manufacturing processes and thus effective solutions to them offer great benefits. In this work, two commonly used heuristic methods for solving production scheduling problems, namely, the Nearest Neighbor (NN) and Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) have been tested on a specific real-life problem and the results discussed. The problem belongs to the class of Asymmetric Travelling Salesman Problems (ATSP), which is known as a hard type problem with no effective solutions for large scale problems available yet. The performances of the Nearest Neighbor algorithm and the Ant Colony Optimization technique were evaluated and compared using two criteria, namely: the minimum value of the objective function achieved and the CPU time it took to find it (including the statistical confidence limits). The conclusions drawn suggest that on one hand the ACO algorithm works better than NN if looking at the achieved minimum values of the objective function. On the other hand, the computational time of the ACO algorithm is slightly longer.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 122
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
Aardal K, 2005, HDBK OPER R, V12, P171
[2]
A review of TSP based approaches for flowshop scheduling [J].
Bagchi, TP ;
Gupta, JND ;
Sriskandarajah, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 169 (03) :816-854
[3]
The multiple traveling salesman problem: an overview of formulations and solution procedures [J].
Bektas, T .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 34 (03) :209-219
[4]
A robust optimization approach to wine grape harvesting scheduling [J].
Bohle, Carlos ;
Maturana, Sergio ;
Vera, Jorge .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 200 (01) :245-252
[5]
LP-based disaggregation approaches to solving the open pit mining production scheduling problem with block processing selectivity [J].
Boland, Natashia ;
Dumitrescu, Irina ;
Froyland, Gary ;
Gleixner, Ambros M. .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2009, 36 (04) :1064-1089
[6]
Dynamic diversity control in genetic algorithm for mining unsearched solution space in TSP problems [J].
Chang, Pei-Chann ;
Huang, Wei-Hsiu ;
Ting, Ching-Jung .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (03) :1863-1878
[7]
DAVULIS G, 2010, INTELLECTUAL EC, P18
[8]
N-fold integer programming [J].
De Loera, Jesus A. ;
Hemmecke, Raymond ;
Onn, Shmuel ;
Weismantel, Robert .
DISCRETE OPTIMIZATION, 2008, 5 (02) :231-241
[9]
DZEMYDIENE D, 2010, INTELLECTUAL EC, P21
[10]
Dzemydiene D, 2010, INFORMATICA-LITHUAN, V21, P521