Cost-effective reduction of NOx emissions from electricity generation

被引:18
作者
Burtraw, D [1 ]
Palmer, K [1 ]
Bharvirkar, R [1 ]
Paul, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Resources Future Inc, Washington, DC 20036 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION | 2001年 / 51卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10473289.2001.10464366
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the benefits and costs of policies to reduce NOx, emissions from electricity generation in the United States. Because emissions of NOx, contribute to the high concentration of atmospheric ozone in the eastern states associated with health hazards, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has called on eastern states to formulate state implementation plans (SIPs) for reducing NOx, emissions. Our analysis considers three NOx, reduction scenarios: a summer seasonal cap in the eastern states covered by EPA's NOx SIP Call, an annual cap in the same SIP Call region, and a national annual cap. All scenarios allow for emissions trading. Although EPA's current policy is to implement a seasonal cap in the SIP Call region, this analysis indicates that an annual cap in the SIP Call region would yield about $400 million more in net benefits (benefits less costs) than would a seasonal policy, based on particulate-related health effects only. An annual cap in the SIP Call region is also the policy that is most likely to achieve benefits in excess of costs. Consideration of omissions from this accounting, including the potential benefits from reductions in ozone concentrations, strengthens the finding that an annual program offers greater net benefits than does a seasonal program.
引用
收藏
页码:1476 / 1489
页数:14
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Assessing the externalities of electricity generation in the Midwest [J].
Banzhaf, HS ;
Desvousges, WH ;
Johnson, FR .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (04) :395-421
[2]  
Bloyd C., 1996, ANLDISTM36
[3]   Costs and benefits of reducing air pollutants related to acid rain [J].
Burtraw, D ;
Krupnick, A ;
Mansur, E ;
Austin, D ;
Farrell, D .
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 1998, 16 (04) :379-400
[4]   The cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second-best setting [J].
Goulder, LH ;
Parry, IWH ;
Williams, RC ;
Burtraw, D .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1999, 72 (03) :329-360
[5]  
Krupnick A. J., 2000, COST EFFECTIVE NOX C
[6]  
Krupnick A.J, 2000, AGE HLTH WILLINGNESS
[7]   The social costs of electricity - Do the numbers add up? [J].
Krupnick, AJ ;
Burtraw, D .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (04) :423-466
[8]  
*N AM EL REL COUNC, 2000, REL IMP EPA NOXSIP C
[9]  
NAPOLITANO S, 1999, EL UT ENV C TUCS AZ
[10]  
*OAK RIDG NAT LAB, 1995, ORNLM4994