Full calculation of clumpiness boost factors for antimatter cosmic rays in the light of ΛCDM N-body simulation results -: Abandoning hope in clumpiness enhancement?

被引:117
作者
Lavalle, J. [1 ]
Yuan, Q. [2 ]
Maurin, D. [3 ]
Bi, X. -J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mediterranee, Ctr Phys Particules CPPM, CNRS, IN2P3, F-13288 Marseille 09, France
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst High Energy Phys, Key Lab Particle Astrophys, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Paris 06 & 07, LPNHE, CNRS, IN2P3, F-75252 Paris, France
关键词
cosmology : dark matter;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361:20078723
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Context. Anti-proton and positron Galactic cosmic ray spectra are among the key targets for indirect detection of dark matter. The boost factors, corresponding to an enhancement of the signal, and linked to the clumpiness properties of the dark matter distribution, have been taken as high as thousands in the past. The dramatic impact of these boost factors for indirect detection of antiparticles, for instance with the PAMELA satellite or the coming AMS-02 experiment, asks for their detailed calculation. Aims. We take into account the state-of-the-art results of high resolution N-body dark matter simulations to calculate the most likely energy dependent boost factors, which are linked to the cosmic ray propagation properties, for anti-protons and positrons. The results from extreme, but still possible, configurations of the clumpy dark matter component are also discussed. Methods. Starting from the mass and space distributions of sub-halos, the anti-proton and positron propagators are used to calculate the mean value and the variance of the boost factor for the primary fluxes. We take advantage of the statistical method introduced in Lavalle et al. (2007) and cross-check the results with Monte Carlo computations. Results. By spanning some extreme configurations of sub-halo and propagation properties, we find that the average contribution of the clumps is negligible compared to that of the smooth dark matter component. Dark matter clumps do not lead to enhancement of the signals, unless they are taken with some extreme (unexpected) properties. This result is independent of the nature of the self-annihilating dark matter candidate considered, and provides precise estimates of the theoretical and the statistical uncertainties of the antimatter flux from sub-halos. Conclusions. Spectral distortions can still be expected in antimatter flux measurements, but scenarios invoking large and even mild clumpiness boost factors are strongly disfavoured by our analysis. Some very extreme configurations could still lead to large enhancements, e. g. (i) very small clumps with masses less than or similar to 10(-6) M-circle dot following a M-alpha mass distribution with alpha greater than or similar to 2, highly concentrated with internal r(-beta) profiles with beta greater than or similar to 1.5, and spatially distributed according to the smooth component; or (ii) a big sub-halo of mass greater than or similar to 0(7) M-circle dot within a distance of less than or similar to 1 kpc from the Earth. However, they are very unlikely from either theoretical or statistical arguments.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / U41
页数:30
相关论文
共 180 条
  • [1] Aceves H, 2006, REV MEX ASTRON ASTR, V42, P41
  • [2] HESS observations of the Galactic Center region and their possible dark matter interpretation
    Aharonian, F.
    Akhperjanian, A. G.
    Bazer-Bachi, A. R.
    Beilicke, M.
    Benbow, W.
    Berge, D.
    Bernloehr, K.
    Boisson, C.
    Bolz, O.
    Borrel, V.
    Braun, I.
    Breitling, F.
    Brown, A. M.
    Buehler, R.
    Busching, I.
    Carrigan, S.
    Chadwick, P. M.
    Chounet, L. -M.
    Cornils, R.
    Costamante, L.
    Degrange, B.
    Dickinson, H. J.
    Djannati-Atai, A.
    Drury, L. O'C.
    Dubus, G.
    Egberts, K.
    Emmanoulopoulos, D.
    Espigat, P.
    Feinstein, F.
    Ferrero, E.
    Fiasson, A.
    Fontaine, G.
    Funk, Seb.
    Funk, S.
    Gallant, Y. A.
    Giebels, B.
    Glicenstein, J. F.
    Goret, P.
    Hadjichristidis, C.
    Hauser, D.
    Hauser, M.
    Heinzelmann, G.
    Henri, G.
    Hermann, G.
    Hinton, J. A.
    Hofmann, W.
    Holleran, M.
    Horns, D.
    Jacholkowska, A.
    de Jager, O. C.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2006, 97 (22)
  • [3] Formation and evolution of self-interacting dark matter haloes
    Ahn, K
    Shapiro, PR
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 363 (04) : 1092 - 1110
  • [4] The shape of dark matter haloes: dependence on mass, redshift, radius and formation
    Allgood, B
    Flores, RA
    Primack, JR
    Kravtsov, AV
    Wechsler, RH
    Faltenbacher, A
    Bullock, JS
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 367 (04) : 1781 - 1796
  • [5] Cold dark matter microhalo survival in the Milky Way
    Angus, G. W.
    Zhao, H. S.
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 375 (04) : 1146 - 1156
  • [6] Can MOND take a bullet? Analytical comparisons of three versions of MOND beyond spherical symmetry
    Angus, G. W.
    Famaey, B.
    Zhao, H. S.
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 371 (01) : 138 - 146
  • [7] On the proof of dark matter, the law of gravity, and the mass of neutrinos
    Angus, Garry W.
    Shan, Huan Yuan
    Zhao, Hong Sheng
    Famaey, Benoit
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 654 (01) : L13 - L16
  • [8] ANGUS GW, 2007, ARXIV07040381
  • [9] Cosmic positron signature from dark matter in the littlest Higgs model with T parity
    Asano, Masaki
    Matsumoto, Shigeki
    Okada, Nobuchika
    Okada, Yasuhiro
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2007, 75 (06):
  • [10] ATHANASSOULA E, 2007, MNRAS, P339