An international comparison of knowledge levels of medical students: The Maastricht Progress Test

被引:54
作者
Albano, MG
Cavallo, F
Hoogenboom, R
Magni, F
Majoor, G
Manenti, F
Schuwirth, L
Stiegler, I
vanderVleuten, C
机构
[1] UNIV LIMBURG,FAC MED,OFF INT RELAT,DEANS OFF,NL-6200 MD MAASTRICHT,NETHERLANDS
[2] UNIV BARI,FAC MED,INST MED CLIN 1,BARI,ITALY
[3] UNIV TURIN,FAC MED,DEPT HYG & COMMUNITY MED,TURIN,ITALY
[4] UNIV PERUGIA,FAC MED & SURG,INST GEN PATHOL,PERUGIA,ITALY
[5] UNIV MODENA,DEPT GASTROENTEROL,MODENA,ITALY
[6] UNIV LIMBURG,FAC MED,DEPT EDUC RES & DEV,MAASTRICHT,NETHERLANDS
[7] UNIV WITTEN HERDECKE,FAC MED,DEAN OFF,WITTEN,GERMANY
关键词
clinical competence; cognition; curriculum; International Educational Exchange; Netherlands; School Admission Criteria; students medical/psychology;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2923.1996.tb00824.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The increasing international mobility of medical students has inspired the search for an international assessment format. As one step along this line, kinetics of knowledge acquisition and final cognitive levels of students were compared among one Dutch, one German and four Italian medical faculties. For this comparison, the Maastricht Progress Test (MPT) was used. For four out of the six participating faculties, it was possible to compare the level of knowledge of sixth-year students. These data showed no significant differences on the test as a whole. On the other hand, as judged from cross-sectional data on students from all study years, the kinetics of knowledge acquisition showed different trends. In one school applying problem-based learning, acquisition of knowledge by students occurred almost linearly. In another school, over the first 2 years, acquisition of knowledge occurred only in the basic sciences but not in clinical or public health/behavioural sciences. In two other schools over that same period, students seemed to gain no knowledge at all. In some faculties, a marked boost in knowledge was noted with third- or fourth-year students. These findings may be explained by peculiarities of the respective curricula, selection of students during their studies, and national or local assessment procedures. It is preliminarily concluded that the different educational approaches and assessment systems in medical education in Europe seem to have only limited influence on the final level of knowledge of the graduates. On the other hand, these differences may influence the kinetics of knowledge acquisition, especially in distinct domains like basic or clinical sciences. Therefore, the MPT may not be suitabe to solve the problem of assessment of individual international exchange students, but it may be helpful in identifying corresponding cognitive levels on, for example, basic sciences for students in different curricula.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 245
页数:7
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Bender W, 1984, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V128, P917
[2]   PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING - HAVE THE EXPECTATIONS BEEN MET [J].
BERKSON, L .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1993, 68 (10) :S79-S88
[3]  
BOURGEOIS M, 1992, ERASMUS MOBILITY MED
[4]  
FELETTI GI, 1983, LANCET, V2, P34
[5]  
VANDERVLEUTEN CPM, 1990, PROBLEM BASED LEARNI, P27
[6]  
VERWIJNEN M, 1990, INNOVATION MED ED EV, P40
[7]  
*WHO, 1992, ICD10 INT STAT CLASS