Recruitment to a cinical trial improves glycemic control in patients with diabetes

被引:33
作者
Gale, Edwin A. M.
Beattie, Scott D.
Hu, Jinghui
Koivisto, Veikko
Tan, Meng H.
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Diabet & Metab, Bristol, England
[2] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[3] Lilly Res Labs, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.2337/dc07-0155
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - We assessed the effect upon AlC of recruitment to a clinical trial in patients with diabetes who had been screened and interviewed to determine eligibility but whose therapy was otherwise unchanged. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Eligible trials were selected from the global program of an insulin manufacturer. Included were studies in which patients were seen on a single screening visit, pharmaceutical therapy was not altered before randomization, and AlC was measured in a central laboratory at both screening and randomization. Three trials involving patients with type I diabetes (n = 429) and three trials involving patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 611) were identified for analysis. The main outcome measure was change in AlC. Separate regression equations on the change in AlC were fitted for type 1 and type 2 diabetes and included effects of baseline AlC and the interval between the screening and randomization visits. RESULTS - AlC changed by -0.13% (range +0.09 to -0.26%) in those with type I diabetes at a median of 28 days and by -0.16% (-0.14 to -0.27%) for those with type 2 diabetes at a median of 14 days. The mean change in AlC in those with an interval of >= 28 days was -0.24% for those with type I diabetes and -0.23% for those with type 2 diabetes. The reduction was proportional to initial AlC, with large decreases in those with the poorest initial control but no overall change in those at or below the 10th percentile of AlC. CONCLUSIONS - Recruitment to a clinical trial, independent of any therapeutic intervention, produces improvements in glucose control.
引用
收藏
页码:2989 / 2992
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it [J].
Barnett, AG ;
van der Pols, JC ;
Dobson, AJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 34 (01) :215-220
[2]  
Bastien C., 2000, Investigacion Agraria, Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, P97
[3]   Therapy focused on lowering postprandial glucose, not fasting glucose, may be superior for lowering HbA1c [J].
Bastyr, EJ ;
Stuart, CA ;
Brodows, RG ;
Schwartz, S ;
Graf, CJ ;
Zagar, A ;
Robertson, KE .
DIABETES CARE, 2000, 23 (09) :1236-1241
[4]   Improved glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes patients following participation per se in a clinical trial -: mechanisms and implications [J].
DeVries, JH ;
Snoek, FJ ;
Kostense, PJ ;
Heine, RJ .
DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2003, 19 (05) :357-362
[5]   The Hawthorne studies - a fable for our times? [J].
Gale, EAM .
QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 97 (07) :439-449
[6]  
Gale EAM, 2000, DIABETIC MED, V17, P209
[7]  
Gillespie R., 1991, Manufacturing Knowledge: A History of the Hawthorne Experiments
[8]  
Holcombe JH, 2002, DIABETES, V51, pA101
[9]   Reduced frequency of severs hypoglycemia and coma in well-controlled IDDM patients treated with insulin lispro [J].
Holleman, F ;
Schmitt, H ;
Rottiers, R ;
Rees, A ;
Symanowski, S ;
Anderson, JH .
DIABETES CARE, 1997, 20 (12) :1827-1832
[10]   Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes [J].
Ismail, K ;
Winkley, K ;
Rabe-Hesketh, S .
LANCET, 2004, 363 (9421) :1589-1597