Transit in Washington, DC: Current benefits and optimal level of provision

被引:46
作者
Nelson, Peter [1 ]
Baglino, Andrew [1 ]
Harrington, Winston [1 ]
Safirova, Elena [1 ]
Lipman, Abram [1 ]
机构
[1] Resources Future Inc, Qual Environm Div, Washington, DC 20036 USA
关键词
transit; transit subsidies; traffic congestion;
D O I
10.1016/j.jue.2007.02.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The discrepancy between transit's large share of local transportation resources and its generally low share of local trips has raised questions about the use of scarce transportation funds for this purpose. We use a regional transport model consistent with utility theory and calibrated for the Washington, DC metropolitan area to estimate the travel benefits of the local transit system to transit users and the congestion-reduction benefits to motorists. We find that (i) rail transit generates congestion-reduction benefits that exceed rail subsidies; (ii) the combined benefits of rail and bus transit easily exceed local transit subsidies generally; (iii) the lowest income group received a disproportionately low share of the transit benefits, both in absolute terms and as a share of total income; and (iv) for practical purposes, the scale of the current system is about optimal. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 251
页数:21
相关论文
共 57 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, ALTERNATE ROUTE EFFI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Public Transit Economics and Deregulation Policy
[4]  
[Anonymous], US CENS
[5]  
[Anonymous], FACTORS INFLUENCING
[6]   The effects of new public projects to expand urban rail transit [J].
Baum-Snow, N ;
Kahn, ME .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2000, 77 (02) :241-263
[7]  
BAUMSNOW N, 2005, EFFECTS URBAN RAIL T
[8]  
BENTO AM, 2003, IMPACT URBAN SPATIAL
[9]   Clearing the air in Atlanta: transit and smart growth or conventional economics? [J].
Bertaud, A .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2003, 54 (03) :379-400
[10]  
BLY PH, 1980, TRANSPORTATION, V9, P311