Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters

被引:375
作者
Majchrzak, Ann [1 ]
Jarvenpaa, Sirkka L.
Hollingshead, Andrea B.
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ Texas, McCombs Sch Business, Ctr Business Technol & Law, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Annenberg Sch Commun, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
emergence; tranactive memory systems; coordinating catastrophes; TRANSACTIVE MEMORY-SYSTEMS; MENTAL MODELS; KNOWLEDGE; TRUST; ORGANIZATIONS; PERFORMANCE; COMMUNICATION; IMPROVISATION; RETRIEVAL; WORK;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.1060.0228
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In the aftermath of catastrophic events, when plans for organized and timely response break down, impromptu groups often emerge to provide disaster relief. Much remains to be learned about the internal dynamics of these emergent response groups whose representatives may include members from organizations with relief missions; private sector organizations offering resources; and private citizens with the information, relationships, or physical and mental stamina to help. Organizational theories have the potential to contribute to a better understanding of emergent response groups and how they efficiently coordinate knowledge, people, resources, tasks, and technology, thereby substantially improving disaster response for future catastrophes. We apply one organization science theory toward better understanding of these groups-transactive memory systems theory-which is a theory about knowledge coordination in groups. Our application of this theory to emergent response groups requires extending the theory in three ways: the role of expertise in task assignment, how groups function when credibility in member expertise cannot be validated, and how expertise is coordinated. By demonstrating how transactive memory systems theory can be extended to the unique operating conditions of emergent response groups, we hope to inspire organization science researchers to accept the challenge of adapting their theories to study this important problem of our time.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 161
页数:15
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism
    Adler, PS
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (02) : 215 - 234
  • [2] Anderson A., 2004, ENG MANAG J, V16, P3
  • [3] [Anonymous], THESIS U DELAWARE NE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1987, THEORIES GROUP BEHAV
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1996, TRUST ORG FRONTIERS
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2001, The wiki way: Quick collaboration on the web
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2005, briefing
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1996, TRUST ORG
  • [9] Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others
    Argote, L
    Ingram, P
    Levine, JM
    Moreland, RL
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2000, 82 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [10] Argote L., 1993, INT REV IND ORG PSYC, V8, P333