Dating gestational age by last menstrual period, symphysis-fundal height, and ultrasound in urban Pakistan

被引:51
作者
Jehan, Imtiaz [1 ]
Zaidi, Shahida
Rizvi, Sameera
Mobeen, Naushaba
McClure, Elizabeth M. [2 ]
Munoz, Breda [2 ]
Pasha, Omrana
Wright, Linda L. [3 ]
Goldenberg, Robert L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Aga Khan Univ, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Karachi, Pakistan
[2] Res Triangle Inst, Durham, NC USA
[3] NICHHD, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Drexel Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Gestational age; Last menstrual period; Pakistan; Symphysis-fundal height; Ultrasound; GROWTH-RETARDATION; PREGNANCY; WOMEN; GRAVIDOGRAM; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.03.030
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the accuracy of the reported date of the last menstrual period (LMP) with that of symphysis-fundal height (SFH) in the estimation of gestational age (GA), using an ultrasound (US) scan as reference. Methods: Gestational age was concurrently assessed by the 3 methods in this prospective, population-based, pregnancy-outcome study conducted in Hyderabad, Pakistan, from June 18. 2003, through August 31, 2005, with 1128 women between 20 and 26 weeks of a singleton pregnancy. Results: The mean GA was less by ultrasound than by SFH measurement or the reported LMP, and the mean differences with the US result were statistically significant (P<0.001 for both). At delivery, about 75% of the GA values estimated by SFH measurement were within 7 days and almost 91% were within 14 days of the estimation by ultrasound, compared with 65% and 82% for the GA estimated by the reported LMP. Moreover, using the US as reference, the SFH correctly classified 84% of the term, 68% of the preterm, and 86% of the post-term deliveries (weighted kappa=0.58) compared with the corresponding 79%, 61%, and 55% predicted by the reported LMP (Weighted kappa=0.44). Conclusion: The SFH measurement was found to be more accurate than the reported LMP as a tool to estimate GA and therefore date of delivery, but neither were as accurate as a US scan. (C) 2010 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 234
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
ALEXANDER GR, 1995, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V110, P395
[2]   GESTATIONAL-AGE ASSESSMENT .2. PREDICTION FROM COMBINED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS [J].
ANDERSEN, HF ;
JOHNSON, TRB ;
FLORA, JD ;
BARCLAY, ML .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1981, 140 (07) :770-774
[3]  
ANDERSSON R, 1995, J TROP MED HYG, V98, P169
[4]   DIAGNOSIS OF INTRA-UTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION BY A SIMPLE CLINICAL METHOD - MEASUREMENT OF UTERINE HEIGHT [J].
BELIZAN, JM ;
VILLAR, J ;
NARDIN, JC ;
MALAMUD, J ;
SAINZDEVICUNA, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1978, 131 (06) :643-646
[5]   SHOULD ALL PREGNANT-WOMEN HAVE AN ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION [J].
CHERVENAK, FA ;
MCCULLOUGH, LB .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 4 (03) :177-180
[6]   Controlled trial of fundal height measurement plotted on customised antenatal growth charts [J].
Gardosi, J ;
Francis, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (04) :309-317
[7]   PREMATURITY, POSTDATES, AND GROWTH-RETARDATION - THE INFLUENCE OF USE OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY ON REPORTED GESTATIONAL-AGE [J].
GOLDENBERG, RL ;
DAVIS, RO ;
CUTTER, GR ;
HOFFMAN, HJ ;
BRUMFIELD, CG ;
FOSTER, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 160 (02) :462-470
[8]  
HADLOCK FP, 1982, J ULTRAS MED, V1, P97
[9]  
JIMNEZ M, 1983, OBSTET GYNECOL, V61, P438
[10]  
Kalish R.B., 2005, Ulti'asound Rev OSstet Gynecol, P254, DOI [10.3109/14722240500390166, DOI 10.3109/14722240500390166]