RECONSIDERING THE VALUE OF CONSENT IN BIOBANK RESEARCH

被引:60
作者
Allen, Judy [1 ]
McNamara, Beverley [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Law, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
consent; biobanks; participant view; moral act; trust; relational autonomy; INFORMED-CONSENT; GENETIC RESEARCH; SCIENCE; SOCIETY; TISSUE; PROTECTION; FRAMEWORKS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01749.x
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Biobanks for long-term research pose challenges to the legal and ethical validity of consent to participate. Different models of consent have been proposed to answer some of these challenges. This paper contributes to this discussion by considering the meaning and value of consent to participants in biobanks. Empirical data from a qualitative study is used to provide a participant view of the consent process and to demonstrate that, despite limited understanding of the research, consent provides the research participants with some level of control and a form of self determination that they value. Participation is framed as a moral act of a responsible citizen providing reinforcement of self identity. Consent symbolizes the trust invested in researchers and research institutions to use the biobank for the public good. The paper argues that consent continues to play an important role in biobank participation and that a participant view should inform proposals to modify consent processes.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 166
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, NAT STAT ETH COND HU
[2]  
[Anonymous], AUSTR COD RESP COND
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, GENETIC DATABASES SO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, GENOMICS SOC POLICY, DOI DOI 10.1186/1746-5354-1-2-50
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1964, Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
[6]  
Arnason Gardar, 2004, BLOOD DATA ETHICAL L, P67
[7]   Coding and consent: Moral challenges of the database project in Iceland [J].
Arnason, V .
BIOETHICS, 2004, 18 (01) :27-49
[8]  
Austin Melissa A, 2003, Community Genet, V6, P37, DOI 10.1159/000069544
[9]  
Australian Law Reform Commission, 2003, Report No 96
[10]  
BEAUCHAMP TL, 2009, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA, P111