Resource cost analysis of cervical spine trauma radiography

被引:15
作者
Blackmore, CC
Zelman, WN
Glick, ND
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Radiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Hlth Policy & Adm, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Univ N Carolina Hlth Care Syst, Dept Management Serv, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
cost-effectiveness; economics; medical; spine; injuries; radiography;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2203001449
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine the resource costs of the technical component of cervical spine radiography in patients with trauma and the factors that drive resource costs, to provide a model for resource cost estimation, and to compare resource costs with other methods of cost estimation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Direct measurement was made of technologist labor and supply costs of a cohort of 409 consecutive patients with trauma who underwent cervical spine radiography. Probability of cervical spine injury was determined by reviewing emergency department medical records, An animated simulation model was used to combine cost and injury probability estimates to determine resource costs. Sensitivity analysis explored factors that determined costs and estimated uncertainty in model estimations. Comparison was made with other cost estimates. RESULTS: The average technical resource cost for cervical spine radiography was $49.60. Both direct labor ($19.60 vs $13.33; P < .005) and film ($8.39 vs $6.76; P < .005) costs were greater in patients with high probability of injury than in those with low probability of injury. Overall costs in patients with high probability of injury exceeded those in patients with low probability of injury by 33%. Resource costs exceeded Medicare resource-based relative value unit reimbursements for all patients with trauma. CONCLUSION: Resource costs of the technical components of cervical spine radiography varied with patient probability of injury and were higher than Medicare reimbursements.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 587
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   IMPROVED FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF THE RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT WITH A MICROCOSTING SYSTEM [J].
ARENSON, RL ;
VANDERVOORDE, F ;
STEVENS, JF .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 166 (01) :255-259
[2]   Cost accounting in radiology: Building a cost model using hospital-based, commercially available software [J].
Baker, ME ;
Hesselink, D ;
Borkowski, GP ;
Modic, MT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (01) :7-12
[3]   Cervical spine imaging in patients with trauma: Determination of fracture risk to optimize use [J].
Blackmore, CC ;
Emerson, SS ;
Mann, FA ;
Koepsell, TD .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (03) :759-765
[4]   Methodologic evaluation of the radiology cost-effectiveness literature [J].
Blackmore, CC ;
Magid, DJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 203 (01) :87-91
[5]   Cervical spine screening with CT in trauma patients: A cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Blackmore, CC ;
Ramsey, SD ;
Mann, FA ;
Deyo, RA .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 212 (01) :117-125
[6]  
Blackmore CC, 1997, EMERG RADIOL, V4, P283
[7]  
*DEL TOUCH, 1995, COMP PERF US HOSP SO
[8]   USE AND MISUSE OF THE TERM COST-EFFECTIVE IN MEDICINE [J].
DOUBILET, P ;
WEINSTEIN, MC ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 314 (04) :253-256
[9]   THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN COST AND CHARGES [J].
FINKLER, SA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1982, 96 (01) :102-109
[10]   Extending simulation modeling to activity-based costing for clinical procedures [J].
Glick N.D. ;
Blackmore C.C. ;
Zelman W.N. .
Journal of Medical Systems, 2000, 24 (2) :77-89