Developmental trends in simple and selective inhibition of compatible and incompatible responses

被引:81
作者
van den Wildenberg, WPM [1 ]
van der Molen, MW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
inhibition; stop signal paradigm; signal-response compatibility; processing speed; development;
D O I
10.1016/j.jecp.2003.11.003
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
This study examined age-related change in the ability to inhibit responses using two varieties of the stop signal paradigm. Three age groups (29 7-year-olds, 24 10-year-olds, and 28 young adults) performed first on a visual choice reaction task in which the spatial mapping between the go signal and response was varied between blocks. The choice task was then complicated by randomly inserting a visual stop signal on 30% of the trials. In the simple stop signal paradigm, the stop signal required the inhibition of the planned response. In the selective stop signal paradigm, the stop signal required response inhibition only when the stop signal was presented at the same side as the instructed response to the go signal. The results showed that simple stopping was faster than selective stopping and that selective, but not simple, stopping of incompatible responses was slower than stopping of compatible responses. Brinley plot analysis yielded linear functions relating children's latencies to adults' latencies. Analysis of shared variance indicated that developmental change in the speed of selective stopping continued to be significant even when the effect associated with simple stopping was removed. This pattern of findings is discussed vis-h-vis notions of global versus specific developmental trends in the speed of information processing. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 220
页数:20
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, ATTEN PERFORM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility
[3]   The ability to activate and inhibit speeded responses: Separate developmental trends [J].
Band, GPH ;
van der Molen, MW ;
Overtoom, CCE ;
Verbaten, MN .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 75 (04) :263-290
[4]   Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms [J].
Band, GPH ;
van Boxtel, GJM .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1999, 101 (2-3) :179-211
[5]   Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure [J].
Band, GPH ;
van der Molen, MW ;
Logan, GD .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2003, 112 (02) :105-142
[6]   Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD [J].
Barkley, RA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1997, 121 (01) :65-94
[7]   SOME THOUGHTS ON NEUROCOGNITIVE SLOWING [J].
BASHORE, TR .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1994, 86 (2-3) :295-325
[8]   NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIORS ATTRIBUTED TO FRONTAL-LOBE FUNCTIONING [J].
BECKER, MG ;
ISAAC, W ;
HYND, GW .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 3 (3-4) :275-298
[9]   The development of selective inhibitory control across the life span [J].
Bedard, AC ;
Nichols, S ;
Barbosa, JA ;
Schachar, R ;
Logan, GD ;
Tannock, R .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 21 (01) :93-111
[10]  
Bjorklund David F., 1995, P141, DOI 10.1016/B978-012208930-5/50006-4