Classification of severity of health problems in family/general practice: An international field trial

被引:15
作者
Parkerson, GR
BridgesWebb, C
Gervas, J
HofmansOkkes, I
Lamberts, H
Froom, J
Fischer, G
MeyboomdeJong, B
Bentsen, B
Klinkman, M
deMaeseneer, J
机构
[1] Dept. of Comm. and Family Medicine, Box 3886, Duke University Medical Center, Durham
[2] Equipo CESCA
[3] University of Amsterdam
[4] State Univ. New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook
[5] Medizinische Hoschschule Hannover
[6] University of Groningen
[7] University of Oslo
[8] University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
[9] University of Gent UZ1 K3
关键词
severity of illness; classification of health problems; ICPC;
D O I
10.1093/fampra/13.3.303
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. A methodology is needed for classification of health problems by severity. Objectives. We aimed to test the Duke Severity of Illness Checklist (DUSOI) for feasibility and usefulness. Method. The DUSOI was field tested internationally by 22 family/general practitioners in 9 countries. Results. The DUSOI was found to be feasible for rating severity of illness of health problems in family/general practice. The measure was shown to be clinically useful in older patients and those with chronic and more severe health problems. Variability of severity ratings was less within the same rater:han between different raters (i.e. higher intrarater than interrater reliability). Clinical face validity was supported by the finding that DUSOI ratings classified patients with the same diagnosis and those with different diagnoses according to the severity differences that would be expected clinically. Conclusions. Although research is needed to improve reliability and to test validity further, the DUSOI was shown in the present study to be a methodology that is reasonable for consideration as an international classification of health problems by their severity in primary care patients.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 309
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] AVERILL RF, 1992, HEALTH SERV RES, V27, P587
  • [2] ECCLES M, 1996, IN PRESS EUR J PUBL
  • [3] Fetter RB., 1980, Med Care Res Rev, V18, pi
  • [4] Fleiss J. L., 1999, The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9781118032923, 10.1002/9781118032923]
  • [5] Horn S D, 1983, Inquiry, V20, P314
  • [6] INTERHOSPITAL DIFFERENCES IN SEVERITY OF ILLNESS - PROBLEMS FOR PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT BASED ON DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS (DRGS)
    HORN, SD
    BULKLEY, G
    SHARKEY, PD
    CHAMBERS, AF
    HORN, RA
    SCHRAMM, CJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 313 (01) : 20 - 24
  • [7] Lamberts H., 1987, ICPC. International Classification of Primary Care
  • [8] Parkerson G R Jr, 1994, Arch Fam Med, V3, P968, DOI 10.1001/archfami.3.11.968
  • [9] THE DUKE SEVERITY OF ILLNESS CHECKLIST (DUSOI) FOR MEASUREMENT OF SEVERITY AND COMORBIDITY
    PARKERSON, GR
    BROADHEAD, WE
    TSE, CKJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 46 (04) : 379 - 393
  • [10] QUALITY-OF-LIFE AND FUNCTIONAL HEALTH OF PRIMARY CARE PATIENTS
    PARKERSON, GR
    BROADHEAD, WE
    TSE, CKJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (11) : 1303 - 1313