Landscape matrix modifies richness of plants and insects in grassland fragments

被引:129
作者
Ockinger, Erik [1 ]
Lindborg, Regina [2 ,3 ]
Sjodin, N. Erik [1 ]
Bommarco, Riccardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Ecol, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Univ, Dept Phys Geog & Quaternary Geol, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; SPECIES RICHNESS; ISLAND BIOGEOGRAPHY; NATURAL ENEMIES; RESPONSES; AREA; CONNECTIVITY; DISPERSAL; FOREST; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06870.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
There is an increasing awareness that not only area and isolation, but also the characteristics of the landscape surrounding habitat patches influence population persistence and species diversity in fragmented landscapes. In this study, we examine the effects of grassland fragmentation and land use in the landscape matrix (on a 2 km scale) on species richness of plants, butterflies, bees and hoverflies. These organisms were studied in replicated remnant patches of different sizes and isolation, embedded in landscapes dominated either by forest, arable land or a mix of these. We found positive effects of patch area on species richness of the three insect taxa, but not of plants. Isolation had a negative effect only on hoverflies. Matrix type had contrasting effects on the studied taxa. Species richness of plants and butterflies was lowest in patches in landscapes dominated by arable land and highest in forest-dominated landscapes. For hoverflies, the negative effect of small patch area was strongest in forest-dominated landscapes, and there was a similar non-significant trend for bees. Our study shows the importance of considering matrix characteristics when studying responses to habitat fragmentation. Differences in matrix response among organism groups probably impinge on differing mechanisms. A forest matrix is likely to provide additional resources for butterflies but either constitute a barrier to dispersal or deprive resources as compared to an arable matrix for hoverflies. Enhanced plant diversity in grassland patches embedded in forested landscapes can be explained by habitat generalists more easily invading these patches, or by an unpaid extinction debt in these landscapes.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 267
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Subsidized Island Biogeography Hypothesis: another new twist on an old theory [J].
Anderson, WB ;
Wait, DA .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2001, 4 (04) :289-291
[2]  
As Stefan, 1999, Conservation Ecology, V3, pUnpaginated
[3]   The matrix enhances the effectiveness of corridors and stepping stones [J].
Baum, KA ;
Haynes, KJ ;
Dillemuth, FP ;
Cronin, JT .
ECOLOGY, 2004, 85 (10) :2671-2676
[4]   Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? [J].
Benton, TG ;
Vickery, JA ;
Wilson, JD .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2003, 18 (04) :182-188
[5]   Importance of boreal grasslands in Sweden for butterfly diversity and effects of local and landscape habitat factors [J].
Bergman, Karl-Olof ;
Ask, Lena ;
Askling, John ;
Ignell, Hakan ;
Wahlman, Henrik ;
Milberg, Per .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2008, 17 (01) :139-153
[6]   Dispersal capacity and diet breadth modify the response of wild bees to habitat loss [J].
Bommarco, Riccardo ;
Biesmeijer, Jacobus C. ;
Meyer, Birgit ;
Potts, Simon G. ;
Poyry, Juha ;
Roberts, Stuart P. M. ;
Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf ;
Ockinger, Erik .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 277 (1690) :2075-2082
[7]   Are fragments islands?: Landscape context and density-area relationships in boreal forest birds [J].
Brotons, L ;
Mönkkönen, M ;
Martin, JL .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2003, 162 (03) :343-357
[8]   Island theory, matrix effects and species richness patterns in habitat fragments [J].
Cook, WM ;
Lane, KT ;
Foster, BL ;
Holt, RD .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2002, 5 (05) :619-623
[9]  
Cousins S.A.O., 2008, CONSERV BIOL, V141, P126
[10]   Landscape history and soil properties affect grassland decline and plant species richness in rural landscapes [J].
Cousins, Sara A. O. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2009, 142 (11) :2752-2758