Statewide assessment of hospital-based stroke prevention and treatment services in North Carolina - Changes over the last 5 years

被引:24
作者
Camilo, O
Goldstein, LB
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Ctr Cerebrovasc Dis, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Med Neurol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Ctr Clin Hlth Policy Res, Stroke Policy Program, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
关键词
cerebrovascular disorders; data collection; diagnosis; emergency medical services; primary prevention; thrombolytic therapy;
D O I
10.1161/01.STR.0000103137.44496.AD
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-The first published statewide assessment of stroke prevention and treatment services in the United States was carried out in North Carolina in 1998. The purpose of the present study was to measure changes in these services that may have occurred over the last 5 years. Methods-A 1-page questionnaire was sent to each facility in the state in February 2003. Results were compared with the 1998 survey. Results-Complete responses were obtained from each of the state's 128 facilities. The proportions of hospitals providing CT angiography (35% versus 55%, Pless than or equal to0.01), diffusion-weighted MRI (20% versus 45%, Pless than or equal to0.01), transesophageal echocardiography (45% versus 59%, Pless than or equal to0.02), and inpatient rehabilitation services (25% versus 43%, Pless than or equal to0.01) increased over the 5 years. There was a trend toward more facilities having tissue plasminogen activator protocols (43% versus 54%, Pless than or equal to0.09) but a decrease in the proportion of hospitals with interventional radiologists (23% versus 15%, P<0.01). There was no change in the proportion of the state's population living in a county with a basic stroke prevention and treatment center, with the proportion residing in a county with an advanced center increasing by 12%. Entire regions of the state lacked either type of center, and only 14% had even the essential infrastructure recommended for a Brain Attack Coalition-type primary stroke center. There was no difference in the proportions of hospitals with organized stroke teams, those having a stroke acute care unit, those using stroke care maps, or hospitals having community awareness programs. Conclusions-Certain technologies have become more widely available, but hospital investments in stroke-related programs have not appreciably increased.
引用
收藏
页码:2945 / 2950
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Guidelines for the early management of patients with ischemic stroke - A scientific statement from the Stroke Council of the American Stroke Association
    Adams, HP
    Adams, RJ
    Brott, T
    del Zoppo, GJ
    Furlan, A
    Goldstein, LB
    Grubb, RL
    Higashida, R
    Kidwell, C
    Kwiatkowski, TG
    Marler, JR
    Hademenos, GJ
    [J]. STROKE, 2003, 34 (04) : 1056 - 1083
  • [2] Recommendations for the establishment of primary stroke centers
    Alberts, MJ
    Hademenos, G
    Latchaw, RE
    Jagoda, A
    Marler, JR
    Mayberg, MR
    Starke, RD
    Todd, HW
    Viste, KM
    Girgus, M
    Shephard, T
    Emr, M
    Shwayder, P
    Walker, MD
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (23): : 3102 - 3109
  • [3] Asplund K, 1997, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V314, P1151
  • [4] Thrombolysis for acute stroke in routine clinical practice
    Bravata, DM
    Kim, N
    Concato, J
    Krumholz, HM
    Brass, LM
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 162 (17) : 1994 - 2001
  • [5] A systems approach to immediate evaluation and management of hyperacute stroke - Experience at eight centers and implications for community practice and patient care
    Brott, T
    Broderick, J
    Kothari, R
    ODonoghue, M
    Barsan, W
    Tomsick, T
    Spilker, J
    Miller, R
    Sauerbeck, L
    Farrell, J
    Kelly, J
    Perkins, T
    McDonald, T
    Rorick, M
    Hickey, C
    Armitage, J
    Perry, C
    Thalinger, K
    Rhude, R
    Schill, J
    Becker, PS
    Heath, RS
    Adams, D
    Reed, R
    Klei, M
    Hughes, A
    Anthony, J
    Baudendistel, D
    Zadicoff, C
    Rymer, M
    Bettinger, I
    Laubinger, P
    Schmerler, M
    Meiros, G
    Lyden, P
    Dunford, J
    Zivin, J
    Rapp, K
    Babcock, T
    Daum, P
    Persona, D
    Brody, M
    Jackson, C
    Lewis, S
    Liss, J
    Mahdavi, Z
    Rothrock, J
    Tom, T
    Zweifler, R
    Kobayashi, J
    [J]. STROKE, 1997, 28 (08) : 1530 - 1540
  • [6] Effectiveness of t-PA in acute ischemic stroke - Outcome relates to appropriateness
    Buchan, AM
    Barber, PA
    Newcommon, N
    Karbalai, HG
    Demchuk, AM
    Hoyte, KM
    Klein, GM
    Feasby, TE
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2000, 54 (03) : 679 - 684
  • [7] Indications, outcomes, and provider volumes for carotid endarterectomy
    Cebul, RD
    Snow, RJ
    Pine, R
    Hertzer, NR
    Norris, DG
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (16): : 1282 - 1287
  • [8] Hospital and surgeon determinants of carotid endarterectomy outcomes
    Feasby, TE
    Quan, H
    Ghali, WA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2002, 59 (12) : 1877 - 1881
  • [9] Goldstein L B, 1999, J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, V8, P349, DOI 10.1016/S1052-3057(99)80010-X
  • [10] North Carolina Stroke Prevention and Treatment Facilities Survey - rtPA therapy for acute stroke
    Goldstein, LB
    Hey, LA
    Laney, R
    [J]. STROKE, 1998, 29 (10) : 2069 - 2072