Arsenate and arsenite removal by zerovalent iron: Effects of phosphate, silicate, carbonate, borate, sulfate, chromate, molybdate, and nitrate, relative to chloride

被引:423
作者
Su, CM
Puls, RW
机构
[1] ManTech Environm Res Serv Corp, Ada, OK 74821 USA
[2] US EPA, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Ada, OK 74821 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es010768z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Batch tests were performed to evaluate the effects of inorganic anion competition on the kinetics of arsenate (As(V)) and arsenite (As(III)) removal by zerovalent iron (Peerless Fe-0) in aqueous solution. The oxyanions underwent either sorption-dominated reactions (phosphate, silicate, carbonate, borate, and sulfate) or reduction-dominated reactions (chromate, molybdate, and nitrate) with Peerless Fe-0 in the presence of As(V) or As(III), relative to chloride. Pseudo-first-order rate equations were found to describe satisfactorily both As(V) and As(III) removal kinetics in the presence of each competing anion. Of the oxyanions tested for Peerless Fe-0 in the pH range from 7 to 9, phosphate caused the greatest decrease in As removal rate (7.0 x 10(-3) to 18.5 x 10(-3) h(-1)) relative to chloride (34.9 x 10(-3) to 36.2 x 10(-3) h(-1)). Silicate, chromate, and molybdate also caused strong inhibition of As removal, followed by carbonate and nitrate, whereas borate and sulfate only caused slight inhibition to As(III) removal. Present results show that Peerless Fe-0 may be an excellent permeable reactive barrier medium for a suite of mixed inorganic contaminants. The anion competing effects should be considered when designing permeable reactive barriers composed of zerovalent iron for field applications to remediate As(V) and As(III).
引用
收藏
页码:4562 / 4568
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   DISPLACEMENT OF ADSORBED ANIONS FROM SOIL .2. DISPLACEMENT OF PHOSPHATE BY ARSENATE [J].
BARROW, NJ .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1974, 117 (01) :28-33
[2]   ZERO-VALENT IRON FOR THE IN-SITU REMEDIATION OF SELECTED METALS IN GROUNDWATER [J].
CANTRELL, KJ ;
KAPLAN, DI ;
WIETSMA, TW .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1995, 42 (02) :201-212
[3]  
DELCUL GD, 1995, NUCL TECHNOL, V109, P161
[4]   Arsenate and chromate retention mechanisms on goethite .1. Surface structure [J].
Fendorf, S ;
Eick, MJ ;
Grossl, P ;
Sparks, DL .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 31 (02) :315-320
[5]   ENHANCED DEGRADATION OF HALOGENATED ALIPHATICS BY ZERO-VALENT IRON [J].
GILLHAM, RW ;
OHANNESIN, SF .
GROUND WATER, 1994, 32 (06) :958-967
[6]   BORON ADSORPTION ON ALUMINUM AND IRON-OXIDE MINERALS [J].
GOLDBERG, S ;
GLAUBIG, RA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1985, 49 (06) :1374-1379
[7]   EVALUATION FOR CONTAMINANT ION ADSORPTION-DESORPTION ON GOETHITE USING PRESSURE-JUMP RELAXATION KINETICS [J].
GROSSL, PR ;
SPARKS, DL .
GEODERMA, 1995, 67 (1-2) :87-101
[8]   Reductive precipitation of uranium(VI) by zero-valent iron [J].
Gu, B ;
Liang, L ;
Dickey, MJ ;
Yin, X ;
Dai, S .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 32 (21) :3366-3373
[9]   ANION ADSORPTION BY GOETHITE AND GIBBSITE .1. ROLE OF PROTON IN DETERMINING ADSORPTION ENVELOPES [J].
HINGSTON, FJ ;
QUIRK, JP ;
POSNER, AM .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1972, 23 (02) :177-&
[10]  
HINGSTON FJ, 1981, ADSORPTION INORGANIC, P51