Comparison of late toxicity between continuous low-dose-rate and pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients

被引:27
作者
Bachtiary, B
Dewitt, A
Pintilie, M
Jezioranski, J
Ahonen, S
Levin, W
Manchul, L
Yeung, I
Milosevic, M
Fyles, A
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ontario Canc Inst, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Princess Margaret Hosp, Clin Study Coordinat & Biostat, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2005年 / 63卷 / 04期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
cervical cancer; radiotherapy; LDR brachytherapy; PDR brachytherapy; toxicity;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.04.040
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare survival and severe late radiation toxicity between patients who received continuous low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy (BT) and pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) BT for cervical cancer. Methods and Materials: A retrospective review of cervical cancer patients who underwent primary radiotherapy with or without concurrent cisplatin was performed. Late Grade 3 or worse toxicities were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. The study endpoints were overall and disease-free survival and the probability of severe late toxicity. Results: A total of 109 patients (65.7%) received LDR BT and 57 (34.3%) received PDR BT. Seventy patients received concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin. The 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival rate was 70% and 57% for the LDR group and 82% and 70% for the PDR group, respectively (p = 0.25 and p = 0.19). The 3-year probability rate for late Grade 3 or worse toxicity was 7.4% for LDR BT patients and 7.6% for PDR BT patients, respectively (p = 0.69) and 6.9% and 7.6%, respectively, for concurrent chemotherapy vs. none (P = 0.69). Conclusion: No difference was found in severe late toxicity, overall survival, or disease-free survival between the LDR and PDR groups. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1077 / 1082
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT J GYNECOL OBSTET
[2]   CONDITIONS FOR THE EQUIVALENCE OF CONTINUOUS TO PULSED LOW-DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY [J].
BRENNER, DJ ;
HALL, EJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 20 (01) :181-190
[3]   Pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy: Design of convenient (daytime-only) schedules [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Schiff, PB ;
Huang, YP ;
Hall, EJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (04) :809-815
[4]   POTENTIAL REDUCED LATE EFFECTS FOR PULSED BRACHYTHERAPY COMPARED WITH CONVENTIONAL LDR [J].
BRENNER, DJ ;
HALL, EJ ;
HUANG, Y ;
SACHS, RK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (01) :201-202
[5]   TIME-COURSE AND INCIDENCE OF LATE COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH RADIATION-THERAPY FOR FIGO STAGE IB CARCINOMA OF THE UTERINE CERVIX [J].
EIFEL, PJ ;
LEVENBACK, C ;
WHARTON, JT ;
OSWALD, MJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 32 (05) :1289-1300
[6]   Tumor hypoxia has independent predictor impact only in patients with node-negative cervix cancer [J].
Fyles, A ;
Milosevic, M ;
Hedley, D ;
Pintilie, M ;
Levin, W ;
Manchul, L ;
Hill, RP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (03) :680-687
[7]  
*IACR, GLOB CANC INC MORT P
[8]   Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer [J].
Morris, M ;
Eifel, PJ ;
Lu, JD ;
Grigsby, PW ;
Levenback, C ;
Stevens, RE ;
Rotman, M ;
Gershenson, DM ;
Mutch, DG .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (15) :1137-1143
[9]  
*NAT CANC I, 1999, COMM TOX CRIT MAN VE
[10]   High-dose-rate brachytherapy may be radiobiologically superior to low-dose rate due to slow repair of late-responding normal tissue cells [J].
Orton, CG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (01) :183-189