An economic evaluation of sequential IV/po moxifloxacin therapy compared to IV/po co-amoxidav with or without clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia

被引:45
作者
Drummond, MF
Becker, DL
Hux, M
Chancellor, JVM
Duprat-Lomon, I
Kubin, R
Sagnier, PP
机构
[1] Innovus Res UK Ltd, European Operat, Wycombe HP11 2ER, Bucks, England
[2] Innovus Res inc, Burlington, ON, Canada
[3] Bayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany
[4] BBayer Pharma, Paris, France
[5] Bayer PLC, Stoke Poges, Berks, England
关键词
community-acquired infections; costs and cost analysis; economics; pharmaceutical; pneumonia; bacterial; randomized controlled trials;
D O I
10.1378/chest.124.2.526
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: To evaluate costs, clinical consequences, and cost-effectiveness from a German and French health-care system perspective of sequential IV/po moxifloxacin monotherapy compared to co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin (AMC +/- CIA) in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who required parenteral treatment. Methods: Costs and consequences over 21 days were evaluated based on clinical cure rates 5 to 7 days after treatment and health resource use reported for the TARGET multinational, prospective, randomized, open-label trial. This trial compared sequential IV/po monotherapy with moxifloxacin (400 mg qd) to IV/po co-amoxiclav (1.2 g IV/625 mg po tid) with or without clarithromycin (500 mg bid) for 7 to 14 days in hospitalized patients with CAP. Since no country-by-treatment interaction was found in spite of some country differences for length of hospital stays, resource data (antimicrobial treatment, hospitalization, and out-of-hospital care) from all centers were pooled and valued using German and French unit prices to estimate CAP-related cost to the German Sickness Funds and French public health-care sector, respectively. Results: Compared to AMC +/- CLA, treatment with moxifloxacin resulted in 5.3% more patients achieving clinical cure 5 to 7 days after therapy (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 11.8%), increased speed of response (I day sooner for median time to first return to apyrexia, p = 0.008), and a reduction in hospital stay by 0.81 days (95% CI, -0.01 to 1.63) within the 21-day time frame. Treatment with moxifloxacin resulted in savings of 266euro and 381euro for Germany and France respectively, primarily due to the shorter length of hospital stay. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves show moxifloxacin has a greater than or equal to 95% chance of being cost saving from French and German health-care perspectives, and higher probability of being cost-effective at acceptability thresholds up to 2,000euro per additional patient cured. Conclusion: IV/po monotherapy with moxifloxacin shows clinical benefits including increased speed of response and is cost-effective compared to IV/po AMC CLA in the treatment of CAP.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 535
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA [J].
BARTLETT, JG ;
MUNDY, LM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (24) :1618-1624
[2]  
Briggs A., 2001, Economic evaluation in health care, P172
[3]  
*BUR INF SYST, GEB ARZT GOA
[4]  
Collet J P, 2001, Can Respir J, V8, P27
[5]   In vitro activity of BAY 12-8039, a new 8-methoxyquinolone [J].
Dalhoff, A ;
Petersen, U ;
Endermann, R .
CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 42 (06) :410-425
[6]   Cost-effectiveness of ceftazidime or imipenem/cilastatin versus ceftriaxone plus aminoglycoside in the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients in Germany [J].
Dietrich, ES ;
Patz, E ;
Frank, U ;
Daschner, FD .
INFECTION, 1999, 27 (01) :23-27
[7]   Cost-effectiveness of gatifloxacin vs ceftriaxone with a macrolide for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia [J].
Dresser, LD ;
Niederman, MS ;
Paladino, JA .
CHEST, 2001, 119 (05) :1439-1448
[8]  
Drummond M., 2001, EC EVALUATION HLTH C
[9]   Randomized controlled trial of sequential intravenous (i.v.) and oral moxifloxacin compared with sequential i.v. and oral co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin in patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring initial parenteral treatment [J].
Finch, R ;
Schürmann, D ;
Collins, O ;
Kubin, R ;
McGivern, J ;
Bobbaers, H ;
Izquierdo, JL ;
Nikolaides, P ;
Ogundare, F ;
Raz, R ;
Zuck, P ;
Hoeffken, G .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 46 (06) :1746-1754
[10]   Should clinical trials with concurrent economic analyses be blinded? [J].
Freemantle, N ;
Drummond, M .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (01) :63-64