Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Predict Frailty Progression in Nonfrail Chinese Community-Living Older Adults

被引:30
作者
Dong, Bing-Ru [1 ]
Gu, Xiao-Qing [2 ]
Chen, Hai-Ying [2 ]
Gu, Jie [1 ]
Pan, Zhi-Gang [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Gen Practice, Zhongshan Hosp, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Xidu Community Hlth Ctr Fengxian Dist, Dept Gen Practice, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Frailty progression; prediction model; nomogram; community-living older adults; Chinese; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; TRANSITIONS; DISCRIMINATION; MODELS; STATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamda.2021.05.020
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
030301 [社会学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objective: Frailty state progression is common among older adults, so it is necessary to identify predictors to implement individualized interventions. We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram to predict frailty progression in community-living older adults. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting and Participants: A total of 3170 Chinese community-living people aged >60 years were randomly assigned to a training set or validation set at a ratio of 6:4. Methods: Candidate predictors (demographic, lifestyle, and medical characteristics) were used to predict frailty state progression as measured with the Fried frailty phenotype at a 4-year follow-up, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to develop a nomogram, which was validated internally with 1000 bootstrap resamples and externally with the use of a validation set. The C index and calibration plot were used to assess discrimination and calibration of the nomogram, respectively. Results: After a follow-up period of 4 years, 64.1% (917/1430) of the participants in the robust group and 26.0% (453/1740) in the prefrail group experienced frailty progression, which included 9.1% and 21.0%, respectively, who progressed to frailty. Predictors in the final nomogram were age, marital status, physical exercise, baseline frailty state, and diabetes. Based on this nomogram, an online calculator was also developed for easy use. The discriminative ability was good in the training set (C index = 0.861) and was validated using both the internal bootstrap method (C index = 0.861) and an external validation set (C index = 0.853). The calibration plots showed good agreement in both the training and validation sets. Conclusions and Implications: An easy-to-use nomogram was developed with good apparent performance using 5 readily available variables to help physicians and public health practitioners to identify older adults at high risk for frailty progression and implement medical interventions. (c) 2021 AMDA -The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2571 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]
Clinical prediction rules [J].
Adams, Simon T. ;
Leveson, Stephen H. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 344
[2]
Prospective Association Among Diabetes Diagnosis, HbA1c, Glycemia, and Frailty Trajectories in an Elderly Population [J].
Aguayo, Gloria A. ;
Hulman, Adam ;
Vaillant, Michel T. ;
Donneau, Anne-Francoise ;
Schritz, Anna ;
Stranges, Saverio ;
Malisoux, Laurent ;
Huiart, Laetitia ;
Guillaume, Michele ;
Sabia, Severine ;
Witte, Daniel R. .
DIABETES CARE, 2019, 42 (10) :1903-1911
[3]
Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models Users' Guides to the Medical Literature [J].
Alba, Ana Carolina ;
Agoritsas, Thomas ;
Walsh, Michael ;
Hanna, Steven ;
Iorio, Alfonso ;
Devereaux, P. J. ;
McGinn, Thomas ;
Guyatt, Gordon .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (14) :1377-1384
[4]
Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye [J].
Balachandran, Vinod P. ;
Gonen, Mithat ;
Smith, J. Joshua ;
DeMatteo, Ronald P. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (04) :E173-E180
[5]
Risk Factors of Progression to Frailty: Findings from the Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Study [J].
Cheong, C. Y. ;
Nyunt, M. S. Z. ;
Gao, Q. ;
Gwee, X. ;
Choo, R. W. M. ;
Yap, K. B. ;
Wee, S. L. ;
Ng, T-P .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING, 2020, 24 (01) :98-106
[6]
Frailty and the endocrine system [J].
Clegg, Andrew ;
Hassan-Smith, Zaki .
LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 6 (09) :743-752
[7]
Frailty as a predictor of short-term adverse outcomes [J].
Coelho, Tiago ;
Paul, Constanca ;
Gobbens, Robbert J. J. ;
Fernandes, Lia .
PEERJ, 2015, 3
[8]
Prevalence of Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Persons: A Systematic Review [J].
Collard, Rose M. ;
Boter, Han ;
Schoevers, Robert A. ;
Voshaar, Richard C. Oude .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2012, 60 (08) :1487-1492
[9]
Collins GS, 2015, ANN INTERN MED, V162, P55, DOI [10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z, 10.7326/M14-0698, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010, 10.7326/M14-0697, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025, 10.1002/bjs.9736, 10.1038/bjc.2014.639, 10.1136/bmj.g7594, 10.1111/eci.12376]
[10]
Management of frailty: opportunities, challenges, and future directions [J].
Dent, Elsa ;
Martin, Finbarr C. ;
Bergman, Howard ;
Woo, Jean ;
Romero-Ortuno, Roman ;
Walston, Jeremy D. .
LANCET, 2019, 394 (10206) :1376-1386