Smallholder income and land distribution in Africa: implications for poverty reduction strategies

被引:194
作者
Jayne, TS
Yamano, T
Weber, MT
Tschirley, D
Rui, BF
Chapoto, A
Zulu, B
机构
[1] Dept Agr Econ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[3] Food Secur Res Project, Lusaka, Zambia
关键词
income distribution; land ownership; land use; structural transformation; Africa;
D O I
10.1016/S0306-9192(03)00046-0
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This paper provides a micro-level foundation for discussions of land allocation and its relation to income poverty within the smallholder sectors of Eastern and Southern Africa. Results are drawn from nationally-representative household surveys between 1990 and 2000 in five countries: Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Mozambique, and Zambia. The paper shows that farm sizes are declining over time; that roughly a quarter of the agricultural households in each country are virtually landless, controlling less than 0.10 hectares per capita, including rented land; that non-farm income shares are below 40% even for the households in the bottom land quartile; and that because of this, there is a strong relationship between access to land and household income, particularly for farm sizes below 1.0 hectares per capita. Land distribution within these small-farm sectors appears to be becoming more concentrated over time, and their Gini coefficients are comparable to those of many Asian countries at the time of their green revolutions. Lastly, the largest part of the variation in per capita farm sizes within the small-farm sectors is, in every country, predominantly within-village rather than between-village. Realistic discussions of poverty alleviation strategies in Africa need to be grounded in the context of these land distribution patterns and trends. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 275
页数:23
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Land relations under unbearable stress: Rwanda caught in the Malthusian trap [J].
Andre, C ;
Platteau, JP .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1998, 34 (01) :1-47
[2]  
[Anonymous], POOR PEOPLE STAY POO
[3]  
Bassett Thomas, 1993, LAND AFRICAN AGRARIA
[4]  
BENSON T, 2002, C UND POV GROWTH SUB
[5]  
BLOCK P, 1999, RECENT TENURE REFORM
[6]   ROBUST LOCALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION AND SMOOTHING SCATTERPLOTS [J].
CLEVELAND, WS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 74 (368) :829-836
[7]  
CRAWFORD E, 1978, EMPLOYMENT INCOME DI
[8]   Farm productivity and rural poverty in India [J].
Datt, G ;
Ravallion, M .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 1998, 34 (04) :62-85
[9]   A new data set measuring income inequality [J].
Deininger, K ;
Squire, L .
WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1996, 10 (03) :565-591
[10]   New ways of looking at old issues: inequality and growth [J].
Deininger, K ;
Squire, L .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 1998, 57 (02) :259-287