National trends and costs of surgical treatment for female fecal incontinence

被引:11
作者
Sung, Vivian W. [1 ]
Rogers, Michelle L. [3 ]
Myers, Deborah L. [1 ]
Akbari, Homayoon M. [2 ]
Clark, Melissa A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Urogynecol & Reconstruct Pelvic Surg, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Div Colorectal Surg, Providence, RI USA
[3] Brown Univ, Brown Med Sch, Ctr Gerontol & Hlth Care Res, Dept Community Hlth, Providence, RI USA
关键词
cost; fecal incontinence; surgical management; trends;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.058
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to describe national trends, hospital charges, and costs of inpatient surgical treatment for female fecal incontinence in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2003 to identify women who underwent surgery for fecal incontinence using International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision-CM coding. We examined national trends in procedures, patient demographics, outcomes, hospital charges, and costs. Multiple linear regression was used to identify variables associated with increased costs. RESULTS: A total of 21,547 women underwent inpatient surgery for fecal incontinence during the study period. This number has remained stable, with 3423 procedures in 1998 and 3509 procedures in 2003. The overall risk of complications was 15.4% and the risk of death was 0.02%, which remained stable during the study period. Total charges increased from $34 million in 1998 to $57.5 million in 2003, translating to a total cost of $24.5 million in 2003. Variables associated with increased costs included number of procedures per admission, length of stay, patient age, and race (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The number of women undergoing surgical treatment for fecal incontinence is stable but has a significant economic impact on the health care system.
引用
收藏
页码:652.e1 / 652.e5
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
American College of Obstetricians-Gynecologists, 2006, Obstet Gynecol, V107, P957
[2]  
[Anonymous], HEALTHC COST UT PROJ
[3]   Outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair after 3 months and after a mean of 80 months [J].
Barisic, GI ;
Krivokapic, ZV ;
Markovic, VA ;
Popovic, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2006, 21 (01) :52-56
[4]   Prevalence and burden based study in women [J].
Bharucha, AE ;
Zinsmeister, AR ;
Locke, GR ;
Seide, BM ;
McKeon, K ;
Schleck, CD ;
Melton, LJ .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 129 (01) :42-49
[5]   Relationship between symptoms and disordered continence mechanisms in women with idiopathic faecal incontinence [J].
Bharucha, AE ;
Fletcher, JG ;
Harper, CM ;
Hough, D ;
Daube, JR ;
Stevens, C ;
Seide, B ;
Riederer, SJ ;
Zinsmeister, AR .
GUT, 2005, 54 (04) :546-555
[6]   Fecal and urinary incontinence in primiparous women [J].
Borello-France, Diane ;
Burgio, Kathryn L. ;
Richter, Holly E. ;
Zyczynski, Halina ;
FitzGerald, Mary Pat ;
Kitehead, William ;
Fine, Paul ;
Nygaard, Ingrid ;
Handa, Victoria L. ;
Visco, Anthony G. ;
Weber, Anne M. ;
Brown, Morton B. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (04) :863-872
[7]   Costs of outpatients with fecal incontinence [J].
Deutekom, M ;
Dobben, AC ;
Dijkgraaf, MGW ;
Terra, MP ;
Stoker, J ;
Bossuyt, PMM .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 40 (05) :552-558
[8]   UNITED-STATES HOUSEHOLDER SURVEY OF FUNCTIONAL GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS - PREVALENCE, SOCIODEMOGRAPHY, AND HEALTH IMPACT [J].
DROSSMAN, DA ;
LI, ZM ;
ANDRUZZI, E ;
TEMPLE, RD ;
TALLEY, NJ ;
THOMPSON, WG ;
WHITEHEAD, WE ;
JANSSENS, J ;
FUNCHJENSEN, P ;
CORAZZIARI, E ;
RICHTER, JE ;
KOCH, GG .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1993, 38 (09) :1569-1580
[9]   Diagnosis of anal sphincter tears to prevent fecal incontinence - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Faltin, DL ;
Boulvain, M ;
Floris, LA ;
Irion, O .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 106 (01) :6-13
[10]   Prevalence of anal incontinence and other anorectal symptoms in women [J].
Faltin, DL ;
Sangalli, MR ;
Curtin, F ;
Morabia, A ;
Weil, A .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2001, 12 (02) :117-121