The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity

被引:408
作者
Waterman, Alan S. [1 ]
Schwartz, Seth J. [2 ]
Zamboanga, Byron L. [3 ]
Ravert, Russell D. [4 ]
Williams, Michelle K. [5 ]
Agocha, V. Bede [5 ]
Kim, Su Yeong [6 ]
Donnellan, M. Brent [7 ]
机构
[1] Coll New Jersey, Dept Psychol, Ewing, NJ 08628 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Leonard M Miller Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Ctr Studies Family, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[3] Smith Coll, Dept Psychol, Clark Sci Ctr, Northampton, MA 01063 USA
[4] Univ Missouri, Human Dev & Family Studies, Columbia, MO USA
[5] Univ Connecticut, Dept Psychol, Storrs, CT USA
[6] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Human Dev & Family Sci, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[7] Michigan State Univ, Dept Psychol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
eudaimonism; psychosocial identity; scale validity; well-being; PERSONAL EXPRESSIVENESS; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; IDENTITY DEVELOPMENT; SELF-DETERMINATION; CONCEPTIONS; LIFE SCALE; HAPPINESS; SATISFACTION; CONCEPTUALIZATION; AUTHENTICITY;
D O I
10.1080/17439760903435208
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being (QEWB) was developed to measure well-being in a manner consistent with how it is conceptualized in eudaimonist philosophy. Aspects of eudaimonic well-being assessed by the QEWB include self-discovery, perceived development of one's best potentials, a sense of purpose and meaning in life, intense involvement in activities, investment of significant effort, and enjoyment of activities as personally expressive. The QEWB was administered to two large, ethnically diverse samples of college students drawn from multiple sites across the United States. A three-part evaluation of the instrument was conducted: (1) evaluating psychometric properties, (2) comparing QEWB scores across gender, age, ethnicity, family income, and family structure, and (3) assessing the convergent, discriminant, construct, and incremental validity of the QEWB. Six hypotheses relating QEWB scores to identity formation, personality traits, and positive and negative psychological functioning were evaluated. The internal consistency of the scale was high and results of independent CFAs indicated that the QEWB items patterned onto a common factor. The distribution of scores approximated a normal curve. Demographic variables were found to predict only small proportions of QEWB score variability. Support for the hypotheses tested provides evidence for the validity of the QEWB as an instrument for assessing eudaimonic well-being. Implications for theory and future research directions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 61
页数:21
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Ackrill J.C., 1973, ARISTOTLES ETHICS
[2]   Happiness as achievement [J].
Annas, Julia .
DAEDALUS, 2004, 133 (02) :44-51
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Handbook of self-determination
[4]  
Aristotle, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS
[5]   SENSATION SEEKING - A NEW CONCEPTUALIZATION AND A NEW SCALE [J].
ARNETT, J .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1994, 16 (02) :289-296
[6]   The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS): appraisal with 1700 healthy young adults in The Netherlands [J].
Arrindell, WA ;
Heesink, J ;
Feij, JA .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1999, 26 (05) :815-826
[7]   Predictors of subjective well-being among college youth in Lebanon [J].
Ayyash-Abdo, Huda ;
Alamuddin, Rayane .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 147 (03) :265-284
[8]   PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY - 25 YEARS OF EVALUATION [J].
BECK, AT ;
STEER, RA ;
GARBIN, MG .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1988, 8 (01) :77-100
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond