Effects of attachment styles on the experience of equity in heterosexual couples relationships

被引:18
作者
Grau, I
Doll, J
机构
[1] Univ Bielefeld, Dept Sociol, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany
[2] Univ Kiel, Leibniz Inst Sci Educ, Kiel, Germany
关键词
attachment theory; equity theory; close relationships;
D O I
10.1026//1618-3169.50.4.298
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Employing one correlational and two experimental studies, this paper examines the influence of attachment styles (secure, anxious, avoidant) on a person's experience of equity in intimate relationships. While one experimental study employed a priming technique to stimulate the different attachment styles, the other involved vignettes describing fictitious characters with typical attachment styles. As the specific hypotheses about the single equity components have been developed on the basis of the attachment theory, the equity ratio itself and the four equity components (own outcome, own input, partner's outcomes, partner's input) are analyzed as dependent variables. While partners with a secure attachment style trend to describe their relationship as equitable (i.e., they give and take extensively), partners who feel anxious about their relationship generally see themselves as being in an inequitable, disadvantaged position (i.e., they receive little from their partner). The hypothesis that avoidant partners would feel advantaged as they were less committed was only supported by the correlational study. Against expectations, the results of both experiments indicate that avoidant partners generally see themselves (or see avoidant vignettes) as being treated equitably, but that there is less emotional exchange than is the case with secure partners, Avoidant partners give and take less than secure ones.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 310
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]  
Ainsworth M. D. S., 1978, PATTERNS ATTACHMENT
[3]   AVOIDANCE OF INTIMACY - AN ATTACHMENT PERSPECTIVE [J].
BARTHOLOMEW, K .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 1990, 7 (02) :147-178
[4]  
BIERHOFF HW, 1993, UNPUB ENGE BEZIEHUNG
[5]  
Bohner G, 1998, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V28, P257, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199803/04)28:2<257::AID-EJSP871>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-1
[7]  
Bowlby J., 1982, ATTACHMENT LOSS, V1, DOI DOI 10.1177/000306518403200125
[8]  
Bowlby J., 1980, ATTACHMENT LOSS
[9]  
Bowlby J., 1973, ATTACHMENT LOSS, V2
[10]  
Brennan K. A., 1998, ATTACHMENT THEORY CL, P46, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.PAIN.2006.07.020