The use of GLS regression in regional hydrologic analyses

被引:77
作者
Griffis, V. W.
Stedinger, J. R.
机构
[1] Michigan Technol Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
generalized least squares regression; flood frequency analysis; regional skew; Log-Pearson type 3 distribution;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.06.023
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
To estimate flood quantiles and other statistics at ungauged sites, many organizations employ an iterative generalized least squares (GLS) regression procedure to estimate the parameters of a model of the statistic of interest as a function of basin characteristics. The GLS regression procedure accounts for differences in available record lengths and spatial correlation in concurrent events by using an estimator of the sampling covariance matrix of available flood quantiles. Previous studies by the US Geological Survey using the LP3 distribution have neglected the impact of uncertainty in the weighted skew on quantile precision. The needed relationship is developed here and its use is illustrated in a regional flood study with 162 sites from South Carolina. The performance of a pooled regression model is compared to separate models for each hydrologic region: statistical tests recommend an interesting hybrid of the two which is both surprising and hydrologically reasonable. The statistical analysis is augmented with new diagnostic metrics including a condition number to check for multicollinearity, a new pseudo-(R) over bar (2) appropriate for use with GLS regression, and two error variance ratios. GLS regression for the standard deviation demonstrates that again a hybrid model is attractive, and that GLS rather than an OLS or WLS analysis is appropriate for the development of regional, standard deviation models. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 95
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, HDB HYDROLOGY
[2]  
BENSON MA, 1962, US GEOLOGICAL SURYVE, V1580, P30
[3]   SAMPLE ERROR OF T-YEAR EVENTS COMPUTED BY FITTING A PEARSON TYPE-3 DISTRIBUTION [J].
BOBEE, B .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1973, 9 (05) :1264-1270
[4]   CONFIDENCE-INTERVAL FOR DESIGN FLOODS WITH ESTIMATED SKEW COEFFICIENT [J].
CHOWDHURY, JU ;
STEDINGER, JR .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1991, 117 (07) :811-831
[5]  
Cruff R.W., 1965, U.S. Geol. Survey Water Supply Paper, V1580-E, P56
[6]   An analysis of region-of-influence methods for flood regionalization in the gulf-atlantic rolling plains [J].
Eng, K ;
Tasker, GD ;
Milly, PCD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2005, 41 (01) :135-143
[7]  
FEASTER TD, 2002, 024140 US GEOL SURV
[8]  
GIESE GL, 1996, 964176 US GEOL SURV, P14
[9]  
GREENE WH, 2003, ECONOMETRIC ANALA
[10]  
GRIFFIS VW, 2007, IN PRESS J HYDROL EN