Effect of ultrasonic vibration and various sealer and cement combinations on titanium post removal

被引:31
作者
Bergeron, BE
Murchison, DF
Schindler, WG
Walker, WA
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Endodont, San Antonio, TX 78284 USA
[2] Wilford Hall USAF Med Ctr, Dept Endodont, Lackland AFB, TX 78236 USA
[3] Gen Dorectory Residency, Lackland AFB, TX USA
[4] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Adv Educ Program Endodont, San Antonio, TX 78284 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00004770-200101000-00004
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of ultrasonic vibration on the force required to remove prefabricated posts. Ninety-six extracted human canines were divided into eight groups, which were prepared and obturated with gutta-percha and either a eugenol-containing (Roth's 801 Elite) or eugenol-free (AH26) sealer. Titanium #6 Parapost XH posts were cemented with either zinc phosphate or Panavia 21 resin cement. One half of the sample was subjected to ultrasonic vibration for 16 min at the post-dentin interface, whereas the other half received no vibration (controls). Each combination of sealer, cement, and vibration status was subjected to tensile load to failure using an Instron testing machine. Posts cemented in teeth obturated with gutta-percha and AH26 sealer demonstrated significantly greater resistance to dislodgement, compared with teeth obturated with gutta-percha and Both's 801 Elite sealer. There was no statistical difference in retention of posts cemented with either zinc phosphate or Panavia 21, regardless of the sealer used. Additionally ultrasonic vibration increased post retention for both cements.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 17
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   RETENTION OF DOWELS USING A COMPOSITE RESIN AS A CEMENTING MEDIUM [J].
ASSIF, D ;
FERBER, A .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1982, 48 (03) :292-296
[2]   THE INFLUENCE OF ULTRASOUND IN REMOVING INTRARADICULAR POSTS [J].
BERBERT, A ;
FILHO, MT ;
UENO, AH ;
BRAMANTE, CM ;
ISHIKIRIAMA, A .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1995, 28 (02) :100-102
[3]   EVALUATION OF ULTRASONIC AND SONIC INSTRUMENTS FOR INTRARADICULAR POST REMOVAL [J].
BUONCRISTIANI, J ;
SETO, BG ;
CAPUTO, AA .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1994, 20 (10) :486-489
[4]  
BURGESS JO, 1997, J DENT RES, V76, P183
[5]  
Chapman K W, 1985, Gen Dent, V33, P128
[6]  
CRAIG RG, 1985, RESTORATIVE DENTAL M, P237
[7]  
ElMowafy OM, 1996, J DENT RES, V75, P299
[8]   MICROLEAKAGE OF POSTS USED TO RESTORE ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH [J].
FOGEL, HM .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1995, 21 (07) :376-379
[9]  
Gaffney J L, 1981, J Endod, V7, P228, DOI 10.1016/S0099-2399(81)80180-X
[10]   EFFECT OF THE DENTIN SMEARED LAYER ON TENSILE-STRENGTH OF CEMENTED POSTS [J].
GOLDMAN, M ;
DEVITRE, R ;
PIER, M .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1984, 52 (04) :485-488