Two methods for rapid serological diagnosis of acute leptospirosis

被引:69
作者
Levett, PN
Branch, SL
Whittington, CU
Edwards, CN
Paxton, H
机构
[1] Minist Hlth, Leptospira Lab, St Michael, Barbados
[2] Univ W Indies, Sch Clin Med & Res, Bridgetown, Barbados
[3] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Med, Bridgetown, Barbados
[4] PanBio InDx Inc, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/CDLI.8.2.349-351.2001
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Leptospirosis is a common and underdiagnosed zoonosis, Two rapid assays for serological diagnosis of acute leptospirosis in diagnostic laboratories, the immunoglobulin M (IgM)-dipstick assay and the indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA), were evaluated and compared,vith standard assays. Sera were examined from 104 patients admitted to a hospital for investigation in a leptospirosis diagnostic protocol. Specimens for serology were taken on days 1 and 4 of the patients' hospital stay. Antibodies were detected using an IgM-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), microscopic agglutination test (MAT), an IgM-dipstick assay, and an IHA. Fifty-one patients were found to have leptospirosis, The sensitivity of the IgM-dipstick assay was 98%, its specificity was 90.6%, its positive predictive value was 90.9%, and its negative predictive value was 98%, The sensitivity of the IHA was 92.2%, its specificity was 94.4%, its positive predictive value was 95.9%, and its negative predictive value was 92.7%, The standard IgM-ELISA and MAT, were positive in the first samples tested from 67 and 55% of the cases, respectively, and the rapid IgM-dipstick assay and IHA were positive in 71 and 49%, respectively, in the first sample tested. Both rapid assays are highly sensitive and specific. Neither requires specialized equipment, and both are suitable for use in diagnostic laboratories.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 351
页数:3
相关论文
共 22 条