Impact of Biopharmaceutics Classification System-Based Biowaivers

被引:45
作者
Cook, Jack A. [2 ]
Davit, Barbara M. [3 ]
Polli, James E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Pfizer Inc, Specialty Care Business Unit, Dept Clin Pharmacol, New London, CT USA
[3] US FDA, Off Genet Drugs, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Rockville, MD 20857 USA
关键词
Biopharmaceutics Classification System; biowaiver; bioequivalence; highly variable drugs; cost; DRUG DISPOSITION CLASSIFICATION; BIOEQUIVALENCE; PRODUCTS;
D O I
10.1021/mp1001747
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
100103 [病原生物学]; 100218 [急诊医学];
摘要
The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) is employed to waive in vivo bioequivalence testing (i.e. provide "biowaivers") for new and generic drugs that are BCS class I. Granting biowaivers under systems such as the BCS eliminates unnecessary drug exposures to healthy subjects and provides economic relief, while maintaining the high public health standard for therapeutic equivalence. International scientific consensus suggests class III drugs are also eligible for biowaivers. The objective of this study was to estimate the economic impact of class I BCS-based biowaivers, along with the economic impact of a potential expansion to BCS class III. Methods consider the distribution of drugs across the four BCS classes, numbers of in vivo bioequivalence studies performed from a five year period, and effects of highly variable drugs (HVDs). Results indicate that 26% of all drugs are class I non-HVDs, 7% are class I HVDs, 27% are class III non-HVDs, and 3% are class III HVDs. An estimated 66 to 76 million dollars can be saved each year in clinical study costs if all class I compounds were granted biowaivers. Between 21 and 24 million dollars of this savings is from HVDs. If BCS class III compounds were also granted waivers, an additional direct savings of 62 to 71 million dollars would be realized, with 9 to 10 million dollars coming from HVDs.
引用
收藏
页码:1539 / 1544
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2002, Dissolution Technol, DOI DOI 10.14227/DT090202P6
[2]
[Anonymous], 2010, GUID INV BIOEQ
[3]
BENET L, 2006, THERAPEUTICS CONSIDE
[4]
Highly variable drugs: Observations from bioequivalence data submitted to the FDA for new generic drug applications [J].
Davit, Barbara M. ;
Conner, Dale P. ;
Fabian-Fritsch, Beth ;
Haidar, Sam H. ;
Jiang, Xiaojian ;
Patel, Devvrat T. ;
Seo, Paul R. H. ;
Suh, Keri ;
Thompson, Christina L. ;
Yu, Lawrence X. .
AAPS JOURNAL, 2008, 10 (01) :148-156
[5]
DILIBERTI CEHY, 2004, WHY BIOEQUIVALENCE H
[6]
Bioequivalence approaches for highly variable drugs and drug products [J].
Haidar, Sam H. ;
Davit, Barbara ;
Chen, Mei-Ling ;
Conner, Dale ;
Lee, LaiMing ;
Li, Qian H. ;
Lionberger, Robert ;
Makhlouf, Fairouz ;
Patel, Devvrat ;
Schuirmann, Donald J. ;
Yu, Lawrence X. .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 25 (01) :237-241
[7]
Feasibility of biowaiver extension to Biopharmaceutics Classification System Class III drug products - Cimetidine [J].
Jantratid, E ;
Prakongpan, S ;
Amidon, GL ;
Dressman, JB .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2006, 45 (04) :385-399
[8]
*JAP I HLTH SCI, QUEST ANSW GUID BIOE
[9]
Obstacles and opportunities in new drug development [J].
Kaitin, K. I. .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 83 (02) :210-212
[10]
Molecular properties of WHO essential drugs and provisional biopharmaceutical classification [J].
Kasim, Nehal A. ;
Whitehouse, Marc ;
Ramachandran, Chandrasekharan ;
Bermejo, Marival ;
Lennernas, Hans ;
Hussain, Ajaz S. ;
Junginger, Hans E. ;
Stavchansky, Salomon A. ;
Midha, Kamal K. ;
Shah, Vinod P. ;
Amidon, Gordon L. .
MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS, 2004, 1 (01) :85-96