Culture and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice

被引:365
作者
Brockner, J
Ackerman, G
Greenberg, J
Gelfand, MJ
Francesco, AM
Chen, ZX
Leung, K
Bierbrauer, G
Gomez, C
Kirkman, BL
Shapiro, D
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Piscataway, NJ 08855 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[5] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Sha Tin 100083, Peoples R China
[7] Univ Osnabruck, D-4500 Osnabruck, Germany
[8] Towson Univ, Towson, MD USA
[9] Univ N Carolina, Greensboro, NC 27412 USA
[10] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jesp.2000.1451
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A central premise of the procedural justice literature-based on studies conducted mainly in the United States-is that people react unfavorably when they have little voice in a decision-making process. The studies reported here evaluated whether the magnitude of voice effects varies across cultures. As predicted. Studies 1-3 showed that the tendency for people to respond less favorably (i.e., with lower organizational commitment) to lower levels of voice was greater in low power distance cultures (United States and Germany) than in high power distance cultures (People's Republic of China, Mexico, and Hong Kong). And in a single cultural setting, Study 4 found a similar interactive effect of voice and people's power distance beliefs on employees' work attitudes and job performance. Theoretical implications for the justice and cross-cultural literatures are discussed, as are practical implications and suggestions for future research. (C) 2001 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 315
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条