Computed Tomography Perfusion Analysis of Pancreatic Carcinoma

被引:47
作者
Klauss, Miriam [1 ]
Stiller, Wolfram [1 ]
Fritz, Franziska [1 ]
Kieser, Meinhard [2 ]
Werner, Jens [3 ]
Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich [1 ]
Grenacher, Lars [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Med Biometry & Informat, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Surg, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
CT; pancreatic carcinoma; perfusion; 2-compartment kinetic model; Patlak model; CT; ADENOCARCINOMA; FEASIBILITY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/RCT.0b013e31824a099e
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate CT perfusion of pancreatic carcinomas using the Patlak model for assessing perfusion, permeability, and blood volume. Methods: A total of 25 patients with pancreatic carcinoma were examined prospectively with a 64-slice computed tomography (CT) using a dynamic sequence after intravenous injection of 80-mL contrast material (370 mg/mL; flow rate, 5 mL/s). Eighty-kilovolt (peak) perfusion acquisitions were evaluated for estimating perfusion parameters for carcinoma and healthy tissue using a 2-compartment model (Patlak model). Results: Twenty patients had hypodense tumors; in 5 patients, the tumor could not be delineated in contrast-enhanced CT. All carcinomas could be identified clearly in the color-coded perfusion maps. Perfusion, permeability, and blood volume values were significant lower in pancreatic carcinomas compared to healthy pancreatic tissue (0.27 +/- 0.20 vs 0.89 +/- 0.19 min(-1), P < 0.0001; 0.43 +/- 0.20 vs 0.75 +/- 0.16 x 0.5 min(-1), P < 0.0001; and 38.9 +/- 20.7 vs 117.8 +/- 46.9 mL/100 mL, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Computed tomographic perfusion of the pancreas using a 2-compartment perfusion model is feasible. Color-coded perfusion maps could be a helpful tool to delineate pancreatic carcinomas even if they are not visible in contrast-enhanced CT.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 242
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
Abe Hisashi, 2005, Radiat Med, V23, P364
[2]
Bertz J, 2010, ERGEBNISSE PRAVALENZ
[3]
Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors: Tumor Blood Flow Assessed with Perfusion CT Reflects Angiogenesis and Correlates with Prognostic Factors [J].
d'Assignies, Gaspard ;
Couvelard, Anne ;
Bahrami, Stephane ;
Vullierme, Marie-Pierre ;
Hammel, Pascal ;
Hentic, Olivia ;
Sauvanet, Alain ;
Bedossa, Pierre ;
Ruszniewski, Philippe ;
Vilgrain, Valerie .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 250 (02) :407-416
[4]
Quantitative Computed Tomography Liver Perfusion Imaging Using Dynamic Spiral Scanning With Variable Pitch Feasibility and Initial Results in Patients With Cancer Metastases [J].
Goetti, Robert ;
Leschka, Sebastian ;
Desbiolles, Lotus ;
Klotz, Ernst ;
Samaras, Panagiotis ;
von Boehmer, Lotta ;
Stenner, Frank ;
Reiner, Caecilia ;
Stolzmann, Paul ;
Scheffel, Hans ;
Knuth, Alexander ;
Marincek, Borut ;
Alkadhi, Hatem .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2010, 45 (07) :419-426
[5]
Enucleation in pancreatic surgery: indications, technique, and outcome compared to standard pancreatic resections [J].
Hackert, Thilo ;
Hinz, Ulf ;
Fritz, Stefan ;
Strobel, Oliver ;
Schneider, Lutz ;
Hartwig, Werner ;
Buechler, Markus W. ;
Werner, Jens .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2011, 396 (08) :1197-1203
[6]
Pancreatic Cancer Surgery in the New Millennium Better Prediction of Outcome [J].
Hartwig, Werner ;
Hackert, Thilo ;
Hinz, Ulf ;
Gluth, Alexander ;
Bergmann, Frank ;
Strobel, Oliver ;
Buechler, Markus W. ;
Werner, Jens .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 254 (02) :311-319
[7]
Whole-organ perfusion of the pancreas using dynamic volume CT in patients with primary pancreas carcinoma: acquisition technique, post-processing and initial results [J].
Kandel, Sonja ;
Kloeters, Christian ;
Meyer, Henning ;
Hein, Patrick ;
Hilbig, Andreas ;
Rogalla, Patrik .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (11) :2641-2646
[8]
Li Z, 2005, RADIOL PRACT, V20, P857
[10]
MEASUREMENT OF HUMAN PANCREATIC PERFUSION USING DYNAMIC COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY WITH PERFUSION IMAGING [J].
MILES, KA ;
HAYBALL, MP ;
DIXON, AK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1995, 68 (809) :471-475