Effects of habitat destruction in a prey-predator metapopulation model

被引:98
作者
Bascompte, J [1 ]
Sole, RV
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Natl Ctr Ecol Anal & Synth, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 USA
[3] Univ Politecn Catalunya, Dept Fis & Engn Nucl, Complex Syst Res Grp, ES-08034 Barcelona, Spain
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jtbi.1998.0803
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A mean field, metapopulation model of a predator-prey interaction is developed in order to understand the consequences of habitat destruction at different trophic levels. Such a model allows us to explore different ecological scenarios (donor control vs. top-down control) by changing a single parameter. The response to habitat destruction is qualitatively the same for both predator and prey, although there are interesting differences linked to the trophic position. A similar decrease in the colonization rate affects the two species quite differently. Predators diminish faster than prey, and furthermore, the fraction of occupied sites decreases more sharply as colonization rates are lowered, i.e. there is a nonlinear relationship between regional abundance and colonization rate. There is a well-defined threshold in the colonization rate below which the predator becomes extinct. Thus, dispersal rate is critical for predicting the consequences of habitat destruction. Finally, these results are compared with the behavior of a spatially explicit simulation. The only difference between the analytical model and the simulation is that colonization is no longer a global phenomenon in the latter, but it is a local process, constrained to the nearest patches. The bulk of the results are similar to the mean field behavior, and we comment on some differences related with non-homogeneity and real space. Some general implications for conservation biology and biological control are outlined. (C) 1998 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 393
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[2]   Habitat fragmentation and extinction thresholds in spatially explicit models [J].
Bascompte, J ;
Sole, RV .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1996, 65 (04) :465-473
[3]   The effect of habitat destruction pattern on species persistence: A cellular model [J].
Dytham, C .
OIKOS, 1995, 74 (02) :340-344
[5]   CONSERVATION OF FRAGMENTED POPULATIONS [J].
FAHRIG, L ;
MERRIAM, G .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1994, 8 (01) :50-59
[6]   Minimum viable metapopulation size [J].
Hanski, I ;
Moilanen, A ;
Gyllenberg, M .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1996, 147 (04) :527-541
[7]  
Hanski I. A., 1997, METAPOPULATION BIOL
[8]  
Harris Larry D., 1992, P197
[9]   SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY AND STABILITY OF PREDATOR-PREY SYSTEMS [J].
HASTINGS, A .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1977, 12 (01) :37-48
[10]   REFUGE THEORY AND BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL [J].
HAWKINS, BA ;
THOMAS, MB ;
HOCHBERG, ME .
SCIENCE, 1993, 262 (5138) :1429-1432