Prenatal diagnosis for women aged 37 years and over: to have or not to have

被引:20
作者
Halliday, JL [1 ]
Warren, R
McDonald, G
Rice, PL
Bell, RJ
Watson, LF
机构
[1] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Epidemiol & Genet Unit, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
[3] Royal Womens Hosp, Dept Perinatal Med, Melbourne, Vic 3053, Australia
[4] La Trobe Univ, Ctr Study Mothers & Childrens Hlth, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
关键词
prenatal diagnosis; prenatal screening; reproductive choice; maternal age;
D O I
10.1002/pd.153
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Forty percent of pregnant women aged 37 years and over do not have prenatal diagnosis despite being eligible for a free test. The present study aimed to determine how often, and which, untested women were making a choice about this, how many declined an offer and why. A questionnaire was given to untested women, aged 37 years and over, at no less than 24 weeks gestation. A total of 375 (81.5%) women declined, 72 (16%) were not offered a test and 13 presented too late antenatally. There was a three-fold increased likelihood (OR 3.10 95% CI 1.44, 6.65) of no offer for urban non-English speaking background women, compared with the reference group (metropolitan. English speaking). Unpartnered women were also significantly less likely to receive an offer (OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.19, 8.46). Risk to the baby was the main reason for declining. When offered non-invasive prenatal screening, most decliners of prenatal diagnosis accepted, even those who declined because they were opposed to abortion. We estimate that overall 33% of older pregnant women were being offered and declining amniocentesis and/or chorion villus sampling (CVS). Only 6% were not offered a test, but this small proportion is over-represented by minority groups who must be given equal opportunity to make this choice. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:842 / 847
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   WOMENS CHOICES FOR FETAL CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS [J].
ABRAMSKY, L ;
RODECK, CH .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1991, 11 (01) :23-28
[2]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL ALTERNATIVES
[3]   Prenatal genetic testing: Content of discussions between obstetric providers and pregnant women [J].
Bernhardt, BA ;
Geller, G ;
Doksum, T ;
Larson, SM ;
Roter, D ;
Holtzman, NA .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 91 (05) :648-655
[4]   Female and male physicians' attitudes toward prenatal diagnosis: A Pan-Canadian survey [J].
Bouchard, L ;
Renaud, M .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (03) :381-392
[5]   Ethnicity, bioethics, and prenatal diagnosis: The amniocentesis decisions of Mexican-origin women and their partners [J].
Browner, CH ;
Preloran, HM ;
Cox, SJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (11) :1658-1666
[6]   Factors influencing informed choice of prenatal diagnosis:: Women's feelings and attitudes [J].
Crang-Svalenius, E ;
Dykes, AK ;
Jörgensen, C .
FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 1998, 13 (01) :53-61
[7]  
Drake E R, 1999, J Genet Couns, V8, P217, DOI 10.1023/A:1022998415890
[8]  
GREEN J, 1993, J REPROD INFANT PSYC, V0011
[9]   PRENATAL SCREENING FOR DOWNS-SYNDROME WITH USE OF MATERNAL SERUM MARKERS [J].
HADDOW, JE ;
PALOMAKI, GE ;
KNIGHT, GJ ;
WILLIAMS, J ;
PULKKINEN, A ;
CANICK, JA ;
SALLER, DN ;
BOWERS, GB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (09) :588-593
[10]   COMPARISON OF WOMEN WHO DO AND DO NOT HAVE AMNIOCENTESIS OR CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING [J].
HALLIDAY, J ;
LUMLEY, J ;
WATSON, L .
LANCET, 1995, 345 (8951) :704-709