Hydrophobicity as a design criterion for polymer scaffolds in bone tissue engineering

被引:132
作者
Jansen, EJP
Sladek, REJ
Bahar, H
Yaffe, A
Gijbels, MJ
Kuijer, R
Bulstra, SK
Guldemond, NA
Binderman, I
Koole, LH
机构
[1] Univ Maastricht, Ctr Biomat Res, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Hosp Maastricht, Dept Orthopaed Surg, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Oral Biol, Maurice & Gabriela Goldschleger Sch Dent Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[4] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Hadassah Sch Dent Med, Dept Prosthodont, Jerusalem, Israel
[5] Univ Maastricht, Dept Mol Genet, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Maastricht, Dept Human Pathol, Cardiovasc Res Inst, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
tissue engineering; scaffolds; biocompatibility in vivo; demineralised bone matrix;
D O I
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.011
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Porous polymeric scaffolds play a key role in most tissue-engineering strategies. A series of non-degrading porous scaffolds was prepared, based on bulk-copolymerisation of 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NVP) and n-butyl methacrylate (BMA), followed by a particulate-leaching step to generate porosity. Biocompatibility of these scaffolds was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, the scaffold materials were studied using the so-called demineralised bone matrix (DBM) as an evaluation system in vivo. The DBM, which is essentially a part of a rat femoral bone after processing with mineral acid, provides a suitable environment for ectopic bone formation, provided that the cavity of the DBM is filled with bone marrow prior to subcutaneous implantation in the thoracic region of rats. Various scaffold materials, differing with respect to composition and, hence, hydrophilicity, were introduced into the centre of DBMs. The ends were closed with rat bone marrow, and ectopic bone formation was monitored after 4, 6, and 8 weeks, both through X-ray microradiography and histology. The 50:50 scaffold particles were found to readily accommodate formation of bone tissue within their pores, whereas this was much less the case for the more hydrophilic 70:30 counterpart scaffolds. New healthy bone tissue was encountered inside the pores of the 50:50 scaffold material, not only at the periphery of the constructs but also in the center. Active osteoblast cells were found at the bone-biomaterial interfaces. These data indicate that the hydrophobicity of the biomaterial is, most likely, an important design criterion for polymeric scaffolds which should promote the healing of bone defects. Furthermore, it is argued that stable, non-degrading porous biomaterials, like those used in this study, provide an important tool to expand our comprehension of the role of biomaterials in scaffold-based tissue engineering approaches. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4423 / 4431
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Agrawal CM, 1997, J BIOMED MATER RES, V38, P105, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199722)38:2<105::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-U
[3]   Coils and tubes releasing heparin. Studies on a new vascular graft prototype [J].
Aldenhoff, YBJ ;
Knetsch, MLW ;
Hanssen, JHL ;
Lindhout, T ;
Wielders, SJH ;
Koole, LH .
BIOMATERIALS, 2004, 25 (16) :3125-3133
[4]   The influence of nacre surface and its modification on bone apposition: A bone development model on rats [J].
Bahar, H ;
Yaffe, A ;
Binderman, I .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2003, 74 (03) :366-371
[5]  
Benzina A, 1996, J BIOMED MATER RES, V32, P459, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199611)32:3<459::AID-JBM20>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-A
[7]   LATE DEGRADATION TISSUE-RESPONSE TO POLY(L-LACTIDE) BONE PLATES AND SCREWS [J].
BERGSMA, JE ;
DEBRUIJN, WC ;
ROZEMA, FR ;
BOS, RRM ;
BOERING, G .
BIOMATERIALS, 1995, 16 (01) :25-31
[8]   Tailoring of new polymeric biomaterials for the repair of medium-sized corneal perforations [J].
Bruining, MJ ;
Blaauwgeers, HGT ;
Kuijer, R ;
Jongsma, FHM ;
de Brabander, J ;
Nuijts, RMMA ;
Koole, LH .
BIOMACROMOLECULES, 2000, 1 (03) :418-423
[9]   Scaffold-based articular cartilage repair [J].
Capito, RM ;
Spector, M .
IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE, 2003, 22 (05) :42-50